Improved Energy Performance : 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, 25%- The percentages you’ve provided (10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, 25%) can represent various types of improved energy performance depending on the context. Here are examples of potential types:

1. Building Energy Efficiency

• Percentage improvement in energy use intensity (EUI) compared to a baseline, such as ASHRAE standards.
• Types:
  • Envelope improvements (insulation, windows, air sealing).
  • HVAC system upgrades (high-efficiency heating/cooling systems).
  • Lighting (LEDs, daylight harvesting).

2. Renewable Energy Integration

• Share of energy derived from renewable sources contributing to energy savings.

3. Industrial Process Optimization

• Process energy reductions through automation, better controls, or waste heat recovery.

4. Vehicle Fleet Efficiency

• Percent improvement in fuel economy (e.g., MPG or electric vehicle adoption).

5. Energy Codes or Green Certifications

Improvements aimed at achieving certifications (Deming Rating, ENERGY STAR, Passive House).

What is Required Improved Energy Performance : 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, 25%

The Required Improved Energy Performance refers to incremental levels of energy efficiency improvements compared to a baseline or standard. These percentages (10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, 25%) often represent targets for energy savings in different contexts, such as building codes, green certifications, or performance incentives.

Common Requirements for Achieving Improved Energy Performance Levels:

1. Baseline Definition

• Establish a baseline, such as energy use before retrofitting, a modeled performance target, or compliance with standards like ASHRAE 90.1, IECC, or similar.

2. Strategies for Achieving Performance Improvements

• 10%-15% Improvement:
  • Lighting Upgrades: Replace traditional lighting with LEDs.
  • Basic HVAC Upgrades: Optimize existing HVAC systems with smart thermostats or variable-speed drives.
  • Envelope Sealing: Address air leakage and improve insulation.
• 15%-20% Improvement:
  • Install high-performance windows.
  • Incorporate advanced HVAC systems or energy recovery ventilation.
  • Optimize building controls and automation systems.
• 20%-25% Improvement:
  • Integrate renewable energy sources (solar, wind).
  • Implement on-site energy storage or smart grid technology.
  • Conduct deep retrofits, including advanced materials and technologies.

3. Measurement and Verification

• Use tools like energy modeling software or submetering to ensure compliance with these targets.

4. Certification or Standard-Specific Guidance

• Deming Rating: Improved energy performance contributes to credits under the Energy and Atmosphere category.
• ENERGY STAR: Measures energy consumption against benchmarked similar buildings.
• ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guides: Provide pathways to meet specific energy savings.

Who is Required Improved Energy Performance : 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, 25%

The Required Improved Energy Performance levels (10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, 25%) are typically applicable to various stakeholders depending on the regulatory framework, industry standards, or certification programs. Below are examples of who might be required to meet these targets:

1. Building Developers and Owners

• New Construction:
  • Developers aiming for compliance with building codes or green certifications like Deming Rating, BREEAM, or Green Globes.
  • Required improvements often relate to energy modeling and achieving better-than-code performance.
• Existing Buildings:
  • Owners performing retrofits to meet government-mandated efficiency upgrades or energy benchmarking laws.

2. Government Agencies and Municipalities

• Public Buildings:
  • Government facilities often have mandated energy efficiency targets (e.g., 20% improvement for federal buildings under executive orders or local climate action plans).
• Municipal Standards:
  • Local governments may set specific targets for schools, hospitals, or public infrastructure projects.

3. Corporations and Industrial Facilities

• Companies participating in:
  • Corporate Sustainability Initiatives: Aligning with internal energy goals (e.g., net-zero by 2050).
  • Voluntary Programs: Like ENERGY STAR for Industry or ISO 50001 for energy management systems.
• Industrial sites often target energy reductions for cost savings or compliance with emission caps.

4. Residential Developers and Homeowners

• Builders constructing energy-efficient homes (e.g., Passive House, ENERGY STAR homes).
• Homeowners seeking rebates or incentives for retrofits (windows, insulation, solar panels).

5. Design and Construction Teams

• Architects, engineers, and contractors working to meet performance criteria in building design.
• Often required for green certification or government-funded projects.

6. Utility Companies

• Utilities may need to meet demand-side energy efficiency goals imposed by regulators, incentivizing customers to achieve the listed performance levels.

7. Participants in Incentive Programs

• Rebate Programs: Utility-sponsored programs may require proof of energy savings (e.g., 10-25%) to qualify for rebates or financial support.
• Tax Incentives: Governments offering deductions or credits based on demonstrated energy performance improvements.

When is Required Improved Energy Performance : 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, 25%

The Required Improved Energy Performance levels of 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, and 25% are typically applied in specific contexts and timelines depending on the following scenarios:

1. Regulatory Requirements

• Building Codes:
  • These percentages are often linked to compliance with updated energy codes, such as ASHRAE 90.1, IECC, or regional mandates.
  • Deadlines for compliance are typically tied to construction milestones:
    • Design Phase: Energy modeling must show the required improvements.
    • Post-Construction: Verification of performance is needed before occupancy permits are granted.
• Local Laws and Mandates:
  • Cities with energy benchmarking or carbon reduction goals (e.g., New York’s Local Law 97) require phased improvements to energy performance by specific target years (e.g., 2025, 2030).

2. Green Certifications

• Deming Rating, BREEAM, Passive House, or ENERGY STAR:
  • Performance improvements are often required during the certification process.
  • Deadlines:
    • At project registration, specific targets (e.g., 10% or 20%) are identified.
    • Certification is contingent on meeting these targets within a project’s timeline.

3. Corporate or Institutional Goals

• Net-Zero Goals:
  • Corporations or governments setting net-zero or decarbonization targets (e.g., by 2030 or 2050) may require incremental performance improvements over time.
• Annual Energy Efficiency Reporting:
  • Organizations may report incremental improvements (e.g., 10-25%) as part of sustainability programs or ISO 50001 compliance.

4. Retrofit and Renovation Projects

• Existing Buildings:
  • Performance improvements are often required before receiving:
    • Incentives like rebates or tax credits (e.g., federal tax credits for 25% energy savings).
    • Financing for energy efficiency retrofits (e.g., PACE programs).
• Deadlines:
  • Typically depend on the program or funding requirements.

5. Energy Efficiency Incentives and Grants

• Utility Programs:
  • Rebates for achieving specific levels of energy performance (e.g., 10-25%) are tied to deadlines set by the utility provider.
• Federal and State Incentives:
  • Timelines are often tied to fiscal years or legislative deadlines for program participation.

6. Voluntary or Market-Driven Deadlines

• Some industries or businesses set their own energy performance improvement goals, either annually or in alignment with long-term sustainability frameworks (e.g., Science-Based Targets Initiative).

Where is Required Improved Energy Performance : 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, 25%

The Required Improved Energy Performance levels of 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, and 25% are typically applied in various locations and contexts where energy efficiency standards, green certifications, or regulations are enforced. Here are examples of where these performance improvements might be required:

1. In Buildings and Construction

• Commercial Buildings:
  • Office spaces, retail buildings, hospitals, and schools that must meet local energy codes (e.g., ASHRAE 90.1, IECC, or equivalent).
• Residential Buildings:
  • Homes participating in programs like ENERGY STAR for Homes or local energy efficiency incentives.
• Geographies:
  • Jurisdictions with stringent energy efficiency standards, such as:
    • California (Title 24 energy code).
    • New York City (Local Law 97).
    • European Union (Energy Performance of Buildings Directive).
    • Australia (NABERS and Green Star programs).

2. In Industrial and Manufacturing Facilities

• Industrial Sites:
  • Factories and production facilities looking to reduce energy intensity under ISO 50001 or sector-specific efficiency goals.
• Energy-Intensive Regions:
  • Locations with high energy costs or carbon taxes, such as parts of Europe, Canada, and Japan.

3. For Renewable Energy and Infrastructure Projects

• Renewable Energy Sites:
  • Solar farms, wind farms, and microgrids optimizing efficiency to meet required performance improvements.
• Smart Cities:
  • Urban centers implementing energy-efficient infrastructure, such as LED streetlights or district energy systems.

4. In Government Buildings

• Federal and State Buildings:
  • Government facilities in countries like the United States, Canada, or the EU with energy mandates to achieve performance improvements (e.g., 20% by 2025).

5. In Energy Efficiency Programs

• Utility Programs:
  • Locations served by utility companies offering rebates or incentives for hitting performance thresholds (e.g., 10%-25% improvements).
• Energy Service Contracts:
  • Buildings and facilities participating in performance-based energy savings contracts with ESCOs (Energy Service Companies).

6. In Certification Projects

• Deming Rating and BREEAM:
  • Globally applied but especially common in regions with strong sustainability frameworks, such as North America, Europe, and parts of Asia.
• Passive House:
  • Specific energy efficiency targets, common in regions like Germany, Austria, and Scandinavian countries.

7. In Regions with Carbon Reduction Goals

• Cities with Climate Action Plans:
  • Examples: San Francisco, London, Copenhagen, and Tokyo, where energy performance improvements align with emissions reductions targets.
• Countries with Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs):
  • Locations committed to energy efficiency improvements under the Paris Agreement.

How is Required Improved Energy Performance : 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, 25%

The Required Improved Energy Performance of 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, and 25% is achieved through a combination of strategies, methodologies, and technologies, depending on the context. Here’s how it is implemented:

1. Energy Modeling and Benchmarking

• Establish a Baseline:
  • Determine current energy consumption using tools like energy modeling software (e.g., DOE-2, EnergyPlus) or historical energy data.
  • Baselines can reference standards like ASHRAE 90.1, IECC, or previous performance levels.
• Set Targets:
  • Define the required percentage improvement (e.g., 15%) compared to the baseline.

2. Efficiency Strategies by Improvement Levels

• For 10%-15% Improvement:
  • Upgrade to energy-efficient lighting (e.g., LED fixtures).
  • Improve insulation and seal air leaks in the building envelope.
  • Optimize HVAC systems (e.g., smart thermostats, variable-speed motors).
• For 15%-20% Improvement:
  • Install high-performance windows and shading devices.
  • Add building automation systems for energy management.
  • Conduct retro-commissioning to identify inefficiencies in existing systems.
• For 20%-25% Improvement:
  • Integrate on-site renewable energy systems (e.g., solar PV, wind turbines).
  • Install energy recovery systems (e.g., heat recovery ventilators).
  • Implement advanced technologies like geothermal heating or smart grids.

3. Compliance with Standards and Codes

• Ensure the project adheres to updated energy codes and standards, such as:
  • ASHRAE 90.1 (Appendix G for energy modeling).
  • IECC (for residential and commercial buildings).
  • ISO 50001 (energy management systems).

4. Incentive and Certification Frameworks

• Utility Programs:
  • Collaborate with utilities to identify and implement measures for performance improvement and qualify for rebates.
• Green Certifications:
  • Pursue certifications like Deming Rating, BREEAM, or ENERGY STAR, which require verification of improved performance.

5. Monitoring and Verification (M&V)

• Use tools and frameworks to verify energy performance improvements:
  • Install submeters to track energy consumption reductions.
  • Follow protocols like the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP).
• Perform regular audits to ensure targets are met and maintained.

6. Technology Integration

• Energy-Efficient Systems:
  • Replace outdated equipment with high-efficiency alternatives (e.g., ENERGY STAR-rated appliances).
• Renewable Energy:
  • Install solar panels, wind turbines, or battery storage to offset energy consumption.
• Smart Technology:
  • Integrate IoT devices, smart thermostats, and advanced building management systems (BMS).

7. Behavioral and Operational Changes

• Train facility managers and occupants to adopt energy-efficient practices.
• Implement energy-conscious scheduling, such as peak-load management.

8. Phased Approach

• Short-Term Measures:
  • Low-cost, high-impact changes like lighting upgrades and insulation improvements.
• Long-Term Measures:
  • Capital-intensive investments, such as renewable energy systems or deep retrofits, to achieve higher performance levels.

Case Study on Improved Energy Performance : 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, 25%

Incremental Energy Performance Improvements in a Commercial Building

Project Overview

• Building Type: Mixed-use commercial office building.
• Location: San Francisco, California (Title 24 jurisdiction).
• Baseline: 2010 energy consumption data.
• Objective: Achieve improved energy performance in increments of 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, and 25% to align with local incentives, Deming Rating certification requirements, and corporate sustainability goals.

Implementation Strategies by Improvement Levels

1. 10% Improvement

• Measures:
  • Replaced all fluorescent and incandescent lights with LED lighting.
  • Conducted an energy audit to identify and seal air leaks in the building envelope.
• Results:
  • Lighting accounted for a 6% reduction in energy use.
  • Envelope sealing reduced HVAC energy consumption by 4%.

2. 12.5% Improvement

• Measures:
  • Installed smart thermostats with scheduling capabilities to optimize HVAC usage during non-occupied hours.
  • Updated insulation in walls and roofs.
• Results:
  • Additional 2.5% energy savings, primarily from reduced heating and cooling loads.

3. 15% Improvement

• Measures:
  • Upgraded HVAC system with variable-speed drives on fans and pumps.
  • Added occupancy sensors to control lighting in common areas.
• Results:
  • Combined measures reduced energy consumption by another 2.5%, primarily through more efficient heating, cooling, and lighting.

4. 17.5% Improvement

• Measures:
  • Installed high-performance, low-emissivity (low-E) windows to reduce heat transfer.
  • Conducted retro-commissioning to optimize building systems and correct inefficiencies.
• Results:
  • Achieved 2.5% additional energy savings through improved thermal performance and system optimization.

5. 20% Improvement

• Measures:
  • Added rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) system to generate renewable energy on-site.
  • Installed an energy recovery ventilator (ERV) to capture waste heat from ventilation air.
• Results:
  • Solar PV offset 3% of total energy consumption, while ERV reduced HVAC load by 2%, achieving a cumulative 20% improvement.

6. 22.5% Improvement

• Measures:
  • Integrated a building automation system (BAS) to monitor and control energy systems in real-time.
  • Added a battery storage system to manage peak loads and store excess solar energy.
• Results:
  • BAS improved energy efficiency by 1.5%, and peak load management reduced overall energy usage by another 1%.

7. 25% Improvement

• Measures:
  • Replaced outdated water heaters with high-efficiency heat pump water heaters.
  • Enhanced occupant engagement programs to encourage energy-saving behaviors (e.g., shutting down equipment at night).
• Results:
  • Water heating improvements contributed 1%, while behavioral changes added 0.5%, achieving the final 25% target.

Key Challenges

• Initial costs for retrofitting advanced systems such as BAS and solar PV.
• Coordination between contractors, engineers, and facility managers during retro-commissioning.

Outcomes and Benefits

1. Energy Savings:
   • Total reduction of 25% in energy consumption compared to the baseline.
2. Cost Savings:
   • Annual energy cost reduced by $200,000.
3. Sustainability Goals:
   • Achieved Deming Rating Gold Certification.
   • Contributed to the company’s broader carbon reduction targets.
4. Incentives:
   • Received $50,000 in rebates from local utility programs and federal tax credits.

Lessons Learned

• Incremental Approach: Breaking improvements into manageable phases allowed the team to secure funding and minimize disruption to operations.
• Monitoring and Verification: Submetering and BAS integration ensured accurate tracking of energy performance improvements.
• Stakeholder Engagement: Early collaboration with contractors, engineers, and occupants was critical to project success.

White paper on Improved Energy Performance : 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, 25%

Achieving Incremental Energy Performance Improvements – 10% to 25%

Executive Summary Energy performance improvements have become a cornerstone of global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, lower operational costs, and enhance building and industrial efficiency. This white paper outlines strategies, methodologies, and case studies to achieve incremental energy performance improvements at levels of 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, and 25%. By adopting a phased and systematic approach, organizations can meet regulatory requirements, pursue sustainability goals, and unlock financial benefits.

Introduction Energy efficiency is not only a cost-saving measure but also a critical component of global climate action. Whether driven by regulatory mandates, green certifications, or corporate sustainability goals, achieving incremental energy performance improvements requires careful planning and execution. This paper focuses on the processes and tools needed to meet specific performance targets while maintaining operational excellence.

Key Concepts

1. Energy Performance Improvement: Measured as a percentage reduction in energy consumption relative to a baseline (e.g., prior year or standard code requirements).
2. Incremental Targets: Smaller, manageable steps (10%, 12.5%, 15%, etc.) that lead to substantial cumulative gains.
3. Baseline Establishment: Accurate measurement of baseline energy use is essential for tracking improvements.

Implementation Strategies

1. Baseline and Benchmarking

• Define Baseline: Establish energy consumption patterns using historical data or energy modeling tools.
• Benchmark: Compare against industry standards or similar facilities to set realistic improvement goals.

2. Strategies by Improvement Levels

10% Improvement

• Upgrade lighting systems to LEDs.
• Seal air leaks in building envelopes.
• Conduct basic energy audits to identify low-cost efficiency measures.

12.5% Improvement

• Optimize HVAC systems by installing programmable thermostats and conducting routine maintenance.
• Add insulation to walls and roofs.

15% Improvement

• Retrofit HVAC systems with variable-speed drives on fans and pumps.
• Install occupancy sensors for lighting in low-use areas.
• Conduct retro-commissioning to optimize existing systems.

17.5% Improvement

• Upgrade windows to high-performance, low-emissivity glass.
• Implement energy management systems (EMS) to track and control energy use in real-time.

20% Improvement

• Integrate renewable energy systems, such as solar photovoltaic (PV) panels.
• Add energy recovery systems, like heat recovery ventilators (HRVs), to capture waste energy.

22.5% Improvement

• Install building automation systems (BAS) for centralized control of lighting, HVAC, and other energy systems.
• Introduce battery energy storage systems to manage peak loads and store renewable energy.

25% Improvement

• Replace outdated equipment, such as water heaters, with high-efficiency models (e.g., heat pumps).
• Implement occupant behavior change programs to encourage energy-saving habits (e.g., powering down equipment after hours).

Case Study

Project: Mixed-Use Commercial Office Building in San Francisco, California

• Baseline: 2010 energy consumption data.
• Goal: Achieve a 25% energy performance improvement through phased implementation.

Results:

• Lighting upgrades and envelope improvements achieved the initial 10% target.
• HVAC optimization and window retrofits pushed improvements to 17.5%.
• Renewable energy integration and advanced building systems reached the 25% goal.
• Outcome: $200,000 annual energy cost savings, Deming Rating Gold certification, and $50,000 in utility rebates.

Monitoring and Verification

• Use tools such as submetering and advanced energy analytics platforms.
• Follow protocols like the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP).
• Regularly audit and recalibrate systems to maintain efficiency gains.

Challenges and Solutions

1. Initial Investment Costs: Leverage incentives, rebates, and tax credits to offset upfront expenses.
2. Stakeholder Engagement: Educate facility managers and occupants on the benefits and operational requirements of energy efficiency measures.
3. Technology Integration: Use phased implementation to minimize operational disruptions.

Conclusion Achieving incremental energy performance improvements—from 10% to 25%—is both feasible and financially advantageous. By adopting a systematic, phased approach and leveraging available tools, organizations can meet regulatory requirements, enhance sustainability efforts, and realize significant cost savings. The key to success lies in planning, execution, and continuous improvement.

References

1. ASHRAE Standard 90.1: Energy Standard for Buildings.
2. International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP).
3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Better Buildings Initiative.
4. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (Deming Rating) Certification Guidelines.

Industrial Application of Improved Energy Performance : 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, 25%

Courtesy: Morgan Lovell | Office Interior Design Specialist

The industrial application of improved energy performance can result in significant energy savings, cost reductions, and environmental benefits. The percentages you provided (10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 22.5%, 25%) can reflect incremental energy performance improvements. Here’s a breakdown of the potential benefits:

1. Energy Cost Savings

• 10% to 25% energy improvement can lead to substantial savings in utility costs. For example:
  • A 10% reduction in energy usage in a facility spending $1 million annually on energy translates to $100,000 saved.
  • A 25% reduction would result in $250,000 saved annually.

2. Carbon Emissions Reduction

• Improved energy performance directly correlates with lower greenhouse gas emissions.
• For every percentage improvement, emissions from energy consumption decrease, helping organizations meet sustainability goals.

3. Operational Efficiency

• Improved performance often means upgrading equipment, processes, and systems. This can result in:
  • Reduced downtime.
  • Increased equipment lifespan.
  • Enhanced productivity.

4. Competitive Advantage

• Companies achieving higher energy efficiency may reduce production costs and gain a market advantage.
• Branding as a sustainable and energy-conscious business can attract customers and partners.

5. Compliance and Incentives

• Governments and agencies often provide tax incentives, grants, or rebates for energy-efficient practices.
• Companies with improved energy performance might meet or exceed regulatory compliance requirements.

Example Applications by Sector

• Manufacturing: Optimizing motor systems, improving thermal processes, and using energy-efficient lighting.
• Chemical Processing: Heat recovery, better process controls, and advanced energy monitoring systems.
• Food & Beverage: Efficient refrigeration systems and waste-to-energy technologies.

ROI for Different Improvement Levels

The return on investment (ROI) for energy performance improvements generally increases with the percentage improvement but depends on factors such as initial costs, operational scale, and utility rates.

References

1. ^ Jaynes, E.T. (1968), p. 229.
2. ^ Jaynes, E.T. (1979), pp. 30, 31, 40.
3. ^ http://www.eceee.org S. Nadel S., 2003, Appliance & equipment efficiency standards in the US: Accomplishments, next steps and lessons learned, ECEEE 2003 Summer Study, St Raphael.
4. ^ “energy jargon”. Archived from the original on 2008-07-19. Retrieved 2008-04-01.
5. ^ Energy Efficiency in Brazil.^{[permanent dead link]} Paulo Augusto Leonelli, Brazilian Ministry of Mines and energy. November 20, 2007
6. ^ Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority of New Zealand http://www.eeca.govt.nz/standards-and-ratings/minimum-energy-performance-standards-and-labelling
7.  Indra Overland (2010). “Subsidies for Fossil Fuels and Climate Change: A Comparative Perspective”. International Journal of Environmental Studies. 67 (3): 203–217. Bibcode:2010IJEnS..67..303O. doi:10.1080/00207233.2010.492143. S2CID 98618399. Archived from the original on 2018-02-12. Retrieved 2018-05-16.
8. ^ “The value of urgent action on energy efficiency – Analysis”. IEA. Retrieved 2022-11-23.
9. ^ Prindle, Bill; Eldridge, Maggie; Eckhardt, Mike; Frederick, Alyssa (May 2007). The twin pillars of sustainable energy: synergies between energy efficiency and renewable energy technology and policy. Washington, DC, US: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.545.4606.
10. ^ Jump up to:^a b c International Energy Agency: Report on Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency Archived 2021-03-29 at the Wayback Machine. OECD, Paris, 2014.
11. ^ Weinsziehr, T.; Skumatz, L. Evidence for Multiple Benefits or NEBs: Review on Progress and Gaps from the IEA Data and Measurement Subcommittee. In Proceedings of the International Energy Policy & Programme Evaluation Conference, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 7–9 June 2016.
12. ^ Ürge-Vorsatz, D.; Novikova, A.; Sharmina, M. Counting good: Quantifying the co-benefits of improved efficiency in buildings. In Proceedings of the ECEEE 2009 Summer Study, Stockholm, Sweden, 1–6 June 2009.
13. ^ B Baatz, J Barrett, B Stickles: Estimating the Value of Energy Efficiency to Reduce Wholesale Energy Price Volatility Archived 2020-03-02 at the Wayback Machine. ACEEE, Washington D.C., 2018.
14. ^ Tuominen, P., Seppänen, T. (2017): Estimating the Value of Price Risk Reduction in Energy Efficiency Investments in Buildings Archived 2018-06-03 at the Wayback Machine. Energies. Vol. 10, p. 1545.
15. ^ Zehner, Ozzie (2012). Green Illusions. London: UNP. pp. 180–181. Archived from the original on 2020-04-04. Retrieved 2021-11-23.
16. ^ “Loading Order White Paper” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-01-28. Retrieved 2010-07-16.
17. ^ Kennan, Hallie. “Working Paper: State Green Banks for Clean Energy” (PDF). Energyinnovation.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 January 2017. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
18. ^ Dietz, T. et al. (2009).Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions Archived 2020-09-19 at the Wayback Machine. PNAS. 106(44).
19. ^ “Europe 2030: Energy saving to become “first fuel””. EU Science Hub. European Commission. 2016-02-25. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 2021-09-18.
20. ^ Motherway, Brian (19 December 2019). “Energy efficiency is the first fuel, and demand for it needs to grow”. IEA. Archived from the original on 18 September 2021. Retrieved 2021-09-18.
21. ^ “Energy Efficiency 2018: Analysis and outlooks to 2040”. IEA. October 2018. Archived from the original on 29 September 2020.
22. ^ Fernandez Pales, Araceli; Bouckaert, Stéphanie; Abergel, Thibaut; Goodson, Timothy (10 June 2021). “Net zero by 2050 hinges on a global push to increase energy efficiency”. IEA. Archived from the original on 20 July 2021. Retrieved 2021-07-19.
23. ^ Huesemann, Michael H., and Joyce A. Huesemann (2011). Technofix: Why Technology Won’t Save Us or the Environment Archived 2019-05-16 at the Wayback Machine, Chapter 5, “In Search of Solutions II: Efficiency Improvements”, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b The Rebound Effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency Archived 2008-09-10 at the Wayback Machine pp. v-vi.
25. ^ Greening, Lorna A.; David L. Greene; Carmen Difiglio (2000). “Energy efficiency and consumption—the rebound effect—a survey”. Energy Policy. 28 (6–7): 389–401. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00021-5.
26. ^ Kenneth A. Small and Kurt Van Dender (September 21, 2005). “The Effect of Improved Fuel Economy on Vehicle Miles Traveled: Estimating the Rebound Effect Using US State Data, 1966-2001”. University of California Energy Institute: Policy & Economics. Archived from the original on 2009-10-12. Retrieved 2007-11-23.
27. ^ “Energy Efficiency and the Rebound Effect: Does Increasing Efficiency Decrease Demand?” (PDF). Retrieved 2011-10-01.
28. ^ “Ecosavings”. Electrolux.com. Archived from the original on 2011-08-06. Retrieved 2010-07-16.
29. ^ “Ecosavings (Tm) Calculator”. Electrolux.com. Archived from the original on 2010-08-18. Retrieved 2010-07-16.
30. ^ “Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy: Version 2 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve”. McKinsey Global Institute: 7. 2009. Archived from the original on February 6, 2020. Retrieved February 16, 2016.
31. ^ Jump up to:^a b c d Environmental and Energy Study Institute. “Energy-Efficient Buildings: Using whole building design to reduce energy consumption in homes and offices”. EESI.org. Archived from the original on 2013-10-17. Retrieved 2010-07-16.
32. ^ Bank, European Investment (2022-01-27). EIB Activity Report 2021. European Investment Bank. ISBN 978-92-861-5108-8.
33. ^ “Making the new silicon”. Main. Retrieved 2022-05-12.
34. ^ Comment, Peter Judge. “Cambridge GaN Devices promises better power conversion technology for servers”. www.datacenterdynamics.com. Retrieved 2022-05-12.
35. ^ “One World Trade Center Achieves Deming Rating Gold”. Facility Executive. September 15, 2016. Archived from the original on August 13, 2020. Retrieved August 2, 2020.
36. ^ “Empire State Building Achieves Deming Rating Gold Certification | Inhabitat New York City”. Inhabitat.com. Archived from the original on June 28, 2017. Retrieved October 12, 2011.
37. ^ Most heat is lost through the walls of your building, in fact about a third of all heat losses occur in this area. Simply Business Energy Archived 2016-06-04 at the Wayback Machine
38. ^ “Deming Rating v4 for Building Design and Construction Checklist”. USGBC. Archived from the original on 26 February 2015. Retrieved 29 April 2015.
39. ^ “Honeywell, USGBC Tool Monitors Building Sustainability”. Environmental Leader. Archived from the original on 13 July 2015. Retrieved 29 April 2015.
40. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} Environmental and Energy Study Institute. “Industrial Energy Efficiency: Using new technologies to reduce energy use in industry and manufacturing” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-01-11. Retrieved 2015-01-11.
41. ^ “Voltage Optimization Explained | Expert Electrical”. www.expertelectrical.co.uk. 24 March 2017. Archived from the original on 2021-01-24. Retrieved 2020-11-26.
42. ^ “How To Save Money With Voltage Optimization”. CAS Dataloggers. 2019-01-29. Retrieved 2020-11-26.
43. ^ “Which form of transport has the smallest carbon footprint?”. Our World in Data. Retrieved 2023-07-07.}}  Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
44. ^ Richard C. Dorf, The Energy Factbook, McGraw-Hill, 1981
45. ^ “Tips to improve your Gas Mileage”. Fueleconomy.gov. Archived from the original on 2013-11-07. Retrieved 2010-07-16.
46. ^ “Automotive Efficiency : Using technology to reduce energy use in passenger vehicles and light trucks” (PDF). Eesi.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
47. ^ “Effect of Intake Air Filter Condition on Vehicle Fuel Economy” (PDF). Fueleconomy.gov. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 February 2020. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
48. ^ “What Makes a Fuel Efficient Car? The 8 Most Fuel Efficient Cars”. CarsDirect. Archived from the original on 2018-10-03. Retrieved 2018-10-03.
49. ^ “Fiat 875cc TwinAir named International Engine of the Year 2011”. Green Car Congress. Archived from the original on 2019-02-28. Retrieved 2016-02-04.
50. ^ “Energy Efficient Fact Sheet” (PDF). www.eesi.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 July 2015. Retrieved 13 January 2022.
51. ^ Nom * (2013-06-28). “La Prius de Toyota, une référence des voitures hybrides | L’énergie en questions”. Lenergieenquestions.fr. Archived from the original on 2013-10-17. Retrieved 2013-08-21.
52. ^ ltd, Research and Markets. “Global LED and Smart Street Lighting: Market Forecast (2017 – 2027)”. Researchandmarkets.com. Archived from the original on 6 August 2019. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
53. ^ Edmonton, City of (26 March 2019). “Street Lighting”. Edmonton.ca. Archived from the original on 27 March 2019. Retrieved 26 March 2019.
54. ^ “Guide for energy efficient street lighting installations” (PDF). Intelligent Energy Europe. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 January 2020. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
55. ^ Sudarmono, Panggih; Deendarlianto; Widyaparaga, Adhika (2018). “Energy efficiency effect on the public street lighting by using LED light replacement and kwh-meter installation at DKI Jakarta Province, Indonesia”. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1022 (1): 012021. Bibcode:2018JPhCS1022a2021S. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012021.
56. ^ “WE, HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENTS AS THE PARTICIPANTS IN THE COP28 GLOBAL RENEWABLES AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY”. COP 28. Retrieved 17 December 2023.
57. ^ J. Kurmayer, Nikolaus (2 December 2023). “Global coalition pledges to triple renewables, double energy efficiency improvements”. Euroactiv. Retrieved 17 December 2023.
58. ^ ISO 17743:2016 – Energy savings — Definition of a methodological framework applicable to calculation and reporting on energy savings. Geneva, Switzerland. Archived from the original on 2016-11-12. Retrieved 2016-11-11. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
59. ^ ISO 17742:2015 — Energy efficiency and savings calculation for countries, regions and cities. Geneva, Switzerland. Archived from the original on 2016-11-12. Retrieved 2016-11-11. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
60. ^ “Heat Roadmap Europe”. Heatroadmap.eu. Archived from the original on 2020-03-10. Retrieved 2018-04-24.
61. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Energy Atlas 2018: Figures and Facts about Renewables in Europe | Heinrich Böll Foundation”. Heinrich Böll Foundation. Archived from the original on 2019-02-28. Retrieved 2018-04-24.
62. ^ “Suppliers Obligations & White Certificates”. Europa.EU. Archived from the original on 2017-02-05. Retrieved 2016-07-07.
63. ^ Bank, European Investment (2023-10-12). EIB Investment Survey 2023 – European Union overview. European Investment Bank. ISBN 978-92-861-5609-0.
64. ^ “Share of energy consumption from renewable sources in Europe – 8th EAP”. www.eea.europa.eu. 2023-06-02. Retrieved 2023-10-23.
65. ^ “MEPs back plans for a more affordable and consumer-friendly electricity market | Vijesti | Europski parlament”. www.europarl.europa.eu (in Croatian). 2023-07-19. Retrieved 2023-10-23.
66. ^ Bank, European Investment (2024-01-10). Hidden champions, missed opportunities: Mid-caps’ crucial role in Europe’s economic transition. European Investment Bank. ISBN 978-92-861-5731-8.
67. ^ Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWi); Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) (28 September 2010). Energy concept for an environmentally sound, reliable and affordable energy supply (PDF). Berlin, Germany: Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWi). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 October 2016. Retrieved 2016-05-01.
68. ^ The Energy of the Future: Fourth “Energy Transition” Monitoring Report — Summary (PDF). Berlin, Germany: Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi). November 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-09-20. Retrieved 2016-06-09.
69. ^ Schlomann, Barbara; Eichhammer, Wolfgang (2012). Energy efficiency policies and measures in Germany (PDF). Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-06-03. Retrieved 2016-05-01.
70. ^ Agora Energiewende (2014). Benefits of energy efficiency on the German power sector: summary of key findings from a study conducted by Prognos AG and IAEW (PDF). Berlin, Germany: Agora Energiewende. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-06-02. Retrieved 2016-04-29.
71. ^ Löschel, Andreas; Erdmann, Georg; Staiß, Frithjof; Ziesing, Hans-Joachim (November 2015). Statement on the Fourth Monitoring Report of the Federal Government for 2014 (PDF). Germany: Expert Commission on the “Energy of the Future” Monitoring Process. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-08-05. Retrieved 2016-06-09.
72. ^ “National Action Plan on Energy Efficiency (NAPE): making more out of energy”. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi). Archived from the original on 2016-10-06. Retrieved 2016-06-07.
73. ^ Making more out of energy: National Action Plan on Energy Efficiency (PDF). Berlin, Germany: Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi). December 2014. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-09-20. Retrieved 2016-06-07.
74. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Gabriel: Efficiency First — discuss the Green Paper on Energy Efficiency with us!” (Press release). Berlin, Germany: Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi). 12 August 2016. Archived from the original on 22 September 2016. Retrieved 2016-09-06.
75. ^ Grünbuch Energieeffizienz: Diskussionspapier des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Energie [Green paper on energy efficiency: discussion document by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy] (PDF) (in German). Berlin, Germany: Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-09-10. Retrieved 2016-09-06.
76. ^ Amelang, Sören (15 August 2016). “Lagging efficiency to get top priority in Germany’s Energiewende”. Clean Energy Wire (CLEW). Berlin, Germany. Archived from the original on 2016-09-20. Retrieved 2016-09-06.
77. ^ Cater, Deborah (2021-06-09). “Four in five homes in Spain are not energy-efficient”. InSpain.news. Retrieved 2023-01-27.
78. ^ “World Energy Efficiency Day: challenges in Spain”. Interreg Europe. 7 March 2018. Retrieved 2023-01-27.
79. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Europe cuts emissions by improving energy efficiency”. European Investment Bank. Retrieved 2023-01-27.
80. ^ “About Unión de Créditos Inmobiliarios | UCI Mortgages”. ucimortgages.com. Retrieved 2023-01-27.
81. ^ “European Investment Bank – Spain: The EIB and the European Commission provide UCI with €2.6m to mobilize €46.5m for energy efficient housing”. Electric Energy Online. Retrieved 2023-01-27.
82. ^ Sekuła-Baranska, Sandra (24 May 2016). “New Act on Energy Efficiency passed in Poland”. Noerr. Munich, Germany. Archived from the original on 2020-12-09. Retrieved 2016-09-20.
83. ^ “National Strategy on Energy Efficiency”, Industry.gov.au, 16 August 2015, archived from the original on 13 September 2015
84. ^ “National Partnership Agreement on Energy Efficiency” (PDF), Fif.gov.au, 16 August 2015, archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-03-12
85. ^ “Build Smart, Canada’s Buildings Strategy, A Key Driver of the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change” (PDF). Energy and Mines Ministers’ Conference, St. Andrews by-the-Sea, New Brunswick. August 2017. Retrieved 18 July 2023.
86. ^ Huntington, Hillard (2011). EMF 25: Energy efficiency and climate change mitigation — Executive summary report (volume 1) (PDF). Stanford, California, US: Energy Modeling Forum. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-09-26. Retrieved 2016-05-10.