DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System

DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System- The DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System is likely a framework or standard designed to assess, certify, and guide sustainable practices for existing buildings. This system would focus on operational efficiency, occupant health, environmental impact, and cost-effectiveness in the ongoing management of buildings.

If this system is based on familiar sustainable building rating systems like Deming Rating for Existing Buildings: Operations & Maintenance (EBOM), it might cover the following key areas:

Core Components of the Rating System:

Energy Efficiency:
- Measures to reduce energy consumption through improved building systems, smart technology, and renewable energy use.
- Regular energy audits and monitoring to meet performance benchmarks.
Water Management:
- Strategies for water efficiency, including low-flow fixtures, water recycling, and monitoring.
- Reduction in potable water use for operations and landscaping.
Indoor Environmental Quality:
- Focus on air quality, natural lighting, and thermal comfort for occupants.
- Use of non-toxic cleaning products and regular air quality assessments.
Materials and Waste:
- Policies for purchasing sustainable and recyclable materials.
- Programs to reduce, reuse, and recycle waste generated during operations.
Site Management:
- Sustainable landscaping, erosion control, and biodiversity preservation.
- Transportation planning to encourage low-carbon commuting for occupants.
Maintenance Policies:
- Scheduled maintenance for building systems to optimize performance and reduce resource waste.
- Use of predictive analytics to identify issues before they become costly problems.
Performance Monitoring:
- Regular reporting on environmental and operational performance.
- Data-driven approaches to achieving continuous improvement in sustainability practices.

Benefits:

Cost Savings: Improved efficiency in energy, water, and maintenance results in lower operational costs.
Enhanced Building Value: Sustainable certifications can increase the asset value of a building.
Occupant Satisfaction: Healthier, more comfortable spaces improve productivity and satisfaction.
Environmental Impact: Reduced carbon footprint and resource usage contribute to global sustainability efforts.

If you are looking for specific information on the DCR Green Existing Buildings O&M Rating System, such as guidelines, certification processes, or tools it provides, let me know! I can help refine this overview or find more tailored details.

What is Required DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System

The Required DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System likely refers to a set of mandatory criteria or prerequisites that buildings must meet to achieve certification or compliance under this system. These requirements ensure a baseline of sustainability, operational efficiency, and environmental responsibility.

While specific details about the DCR Green system might vary depending on the organization or jurisdiction, such systems often have core mandatory elements similar to those in other green building certifications like Deming Rating, BREEAM, or WELL. Below is a general outline of what required elements might look like for such a system:

1. Regulatory Compliance

Ensure compliance with local, regional, and national environmental regulations, including energy codes, water use standards, and air quality laws.

2. Energy Efficiency

Energy Benchmarking: Track and report energy performance using tools like ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager.
Minimum Energy Performance: Achieve a specified energy performance rating or show an improvement over a baseline.
Energy Audits: Conduct periodic energy assessments to identify inefficiencies and improvements.

3. Water Conservation

Water Use Tracking: Monitor and document water consumption in operations and maintenance.
Fixtures and Systems: Install low-flow fixtures, eliminate leaks, and implement water-efficient operational practices.

4. Waste Management

Recycling Programs: Have an active recycling program for common building waste (paper, plastics, metals, etc.).
Waste Diversion Goals: Set and achieve minimum waste diversion rates (e.g., diverting 50% or more of waste from landfills).

5. Indoor Environmental Quality

Minimum Air Quality Standards: Comply with ventilation and air quality standards (such as ASHRAE 62.1 or local equivalents).
Non-Toxic Cleaning Products: Use environmentally friendly and non-toxic cleaning agents and protocols.
Pest Control: Implement integrated pest management (IPM) systems to reduce harmful chemical use.

6. Green Cleaning Practices

Green Cleaning Policy: Develop and implement a plan for sustainable cleaning, ensuring reduced chemical use, and protecting occupant health.
Sustainable Cleaning Equipment: Use equipment that reduces water and energy consumption.

7. Building Maintenance and Durability

Preventive Maintenance: Have a maintenance plan for HVAC, plumbing, electrical, and structural systems to ensure efficient operation.
Monitoring Systems: Utilize building management systems (BMS) to track energy, water, and other key operational metrics.

8. Transportation and Commuting

Sustainable Transport Options: Provide bike racks, electric vehicle charging stations, or promote public transportation.
Transportation Survey: Collect data on occupant commuting patterns to promote lower-carbon transportation options.

9. Site and Landscaping

Pesticide Use Reduction: Minimize or eliminate chemical pesticides and fertilizers.
Erosion Control: Implement measures to prevent soil erosion on-site.
Stormwater Management: Use rainwater harvesting or bioswales to manage runoff.

10. Documentation and Reporting

Sustainability Plan: Maintain a detailed sustainability or operations plan that outlines green O&M practices.
Performance Reporting: Submit periodic reports documenting progress in achieving sustainability goals.

Why Are These Requirements Important?

Baseline Certification Standards: Mandatory criteria ensure a consistent level of environmental responsibility and operational efficiency.
Foundation for Additional Credits: Buildings must meet required standards before pursuing optional credits for higher certification levels.
Environmental and Financial Benefits: Meeting these prerequisites helps reduce operating costs, improve occupant health, and lower environmental impact.

If you’d like detailed information about specific required criteria for the DCR Green system, or if you’re referring to a specific organization, let me know! I can help refine this to match the exact standards or guidelines.

Who is Required DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System

The DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System is likely required by entities or organizations aiming to promote sustainable practices in building operations. These requirements might be mandated or encouraged by a variety of stakeholders, including:

1. Government Agencies

Local, State, or Federal Governments:
- Governments may require buildings owned, leased, or operated by public entities to comply with green building standards, such as the DCR Green O&M Rating System.
- This is common in efforts to align with climate action plans, energy efficiency goals, or environmental regulations.

2. Institutional Building Owners

Public Sector Institutions:
- Universities, hospitals, and other public or semi-public institutions often adopt green standards for their existing buildings to demonstrate environmental leadership and achieve cost savings.
- Institutions managing large building portfolios may have internal policies mandating compliance.

3. Building Operators and Managers

Facility Management Teams:
- Private or public facility managers responsible for the ongoing maintenance of buildings may be required to comply to meet sustainability goals or maintain certifications.

4. Building Owners and Developers

Private Sector:
- Building owners and developers may pursue compliance to enhance property value, reduce operational costs, or meet tenant demands for sustainable and healthy environments.

5. Certification Bodies

Sustainability Certification Programs:
- If the DCR Green O&M Rating System is a formalized certification program, then building owners seeking certification will need to comply with its requirements to achieve a recognized rating.

6. Tenants and Occupants

Tenant-Driven Compliance:
- Large corporate tenants may demand that the buildings they lease meet green standards to align with their corporate social responsibility (CSR) or Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) goals.

7. Organizations with Sustainability Goals

Companies or institutions with carbon neutrality, energy efficiency, or water conservation targets may require their buildings to comply with green standards to achieve broader organizational goals.

Why Compliance Is Required:

Legal Mandates: Some jurisdictions require compliance for publicly funded or large commercial buildings.
Economic Incentives: Compliance may be linked to incentives like tax credits, grants, or subsidies for sustainable buildings.
Environmental Stewardship: Many organizations mandate green building standards to reduce their environmental footprint and align with global sustainability efforts.

When is Required DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System

The Required DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Rating System would typically apply in specific contexts or timeframes depending on the jurisdiction, organization, or regulatory body enforcing it. Here are some scenarios for when it might be required:

1. During Building Renovations or Major Upgrades

The rating system may be mandated when an existing building undergoes significant renovations or retrofits. This ensures that new systems or upgrades comply with green standards.

2. During Lease Renewals or Property Transactions

Compliance with the rating system may be required when renewing leases for government or institutional tenants.
Some jurisdictions or companies require compliance before buying or selling a property to ensure it meets modern sustainability standards.

3. Annual or Periodic Reporting

Many green O&M rating systems require periodic evaluations, such as annual energy performance reports, waste audits, or water usage monitoring. Compliance timelines might align with these reporting cycles.

4. For Publicly-Owned or Government-Leased Buildings

If the building is owned or leased by a government entity, the rating system might be required immediately or within a specific timeframe after new sustainability mandates are issued.

5. To Align with Local Sustainability Deadlines

Some cities, states, or organizations set deadlines for achieving specific sustainability goals (e.g., carbon neutrality by 2030). The rating system may be required as part of the plan to meet these goals.

6. For Certification Renewals

If the DCR Green O&M system is tied to a certification, buildings may need to demonstrate compliance during certification renewal periods, often every 3–5 years.

7. At the Start of New Facility Management Contracts

When a new facility management team is engaged, there may be requirements to implement or align with the DCR Green O&M Rating System from the beginning of the contract term.

8. Compliance with Organizational Sustainability Policies

Organizations with internal sustainability goals may require compliance immediately for all their properties or phase it in over time for certain buildings.

Where is Required DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System

The Required DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Rating System would apply to buildings in specific locations, contexts, or jurisdictions. Here’s an overview of where this system might be required:

1. Public or Government-Owned Buildings

Location: Buildings owned or operated by public agencies (local, state, or federal governments).
Example: Municipal offices, state parks facilities, schools, or transportation hubs managed by the government.
Reason: Governments often implement green building requirements to set sustainability benchmarks for public infrastructure.

2. Urban Areas with Sustainability Mandates

Location: Cities or regions with sustainability goals, climate action plans, or environmental ordinances.
Example: Urban centers like Boston, New York City, or Los Angeles may require compliance with green O&M standards as part of energy benchmarking or carbon reduction programs.

3. Institutional Campuses

Location: Universities, hospitals, and corporate campuses.
Example: Universities might require all existing facilities on campus to meet green O&M criteria to align with their carbon neutrality goals.

4. Buildings Seeking Green Certification

Location: Any building globally that seeks certification under the DCR Green Rating System.
Example: Buildings in diverse locations, such as commercial offices, industrial facilities, or residential complexes, applying for certification.

5. Regions with Green Building Legislation

Location: Jurisdictions with laws or policies promoting green building standards.
Example: States or provinces where green building compliance is mandatory for energy efficiency or waste management.

6. Private Developments Adopting Sustainability Practices

Location: Privately owned properties where developers or owners require compliance with green O&M standards.
Example: Real estate portfolios managed by sustainability-conscious companies, irrespective of geographic location.

7. International Applications

If the DCR Green Rating System is recognized globally, it might apply in countries or regions aligning with international sustainability frameworks like:
- Deming Rating for Existing Buildings: O&M
- BREEAM In-Use
- ISO 14001 for Environmental Management

How is Required DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System

The Required DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Rating System likely operates by providing a structured framework or methodology for improving and maintaining sustainability in existing buildings. Here’s an overview of how it works in practice:

1. Establishing Prerequisites

The system defines a set of mandatory requirements (prerequisites) that all buildings must meet to qualify for certification or compliance.
These could include benchmarks for energy efficiency, water conservation, waste management, and indoor environmental quality.

2. Performance-Based Approach

Buildings are evaluated based on measurable performance metrics such as:
- Energy consumption (e.g., kWh per square foot).
- Water usage (e.g., gallons per occupant).
- Waste diversion rates (e.g., percentage of waste recycled or composted).
Tools like energy benchmarking software (e.g., ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager) may be used for tracking.

3. Compliance Process

Initial Assessment: A building undergoes an audit or evaluation to identify gaps in sustainability practices.
Implementation: Building managers implement changes to meet required standards (e.g., upgrading HVAC systems, installing water-saving fixtures).
Verification: The building’s compliance is verified through documentation, inspections, or performance reports.

4. Categories of Assessment

The rating system typically evaluates buildings across several key categories, including:

Energy Efficiency:
- Reducing energy use through optimized systems, renewable energy sources, and smart technologies.
Water Management:
- Installing water-efficient fixtures and reducing water waste.
Waste Reduction:
- Promoting recycling, composting, and reducing landfill waste.
Indoor Environmental Quality:
- Improving air quality, natural lighting, and occupant comfort.
Maintenance Practices:
- Ensuring preventive maintenance and using environmentally friendly cleaning products.
Transportation:
- Encouraging green commuting options (e.g., bike racks, EV charging stations).

5. Certification Levels (if applicable)

The system may have tiered certification levels (e.g., Certified, Silver, Gold, Platinum) based on the number of points achieved or credits earned beyond the prerequisites.
Each tier reflects an increasing commitment to sustainability.

6. Ongoing Monitoring and Reporting

Compliance with the system often requires regular reporting to maintain certification or recognition.
This includes tracking energy and water usage, waste diversion rates, and indoor air quality over time.

7. Tools and Support

The system may provide tools like:
- Templates for sustainability plans.
- Guidelines for audits and performance measurement.
- Training programs for building managers and staff.
Technical assistance or software tools for benchmarking and reporting.

8. Stakeholder Involvement

Building owners, facility managers, tenants, and third-party auditors collaborate to ensure compliance.
Communication and education are key to ensuring all stakeholders adopt sustainable practices.

9. Recognition and Benefits

Buildings that meet the requirements may receive:
- Certification or a rating from the DCR Green system.
- Public recognition for sustainability efforts.
- Financial incentives, such as tax rebates, grants, or utility savings.

Example Steps for Compliance:

Register the Building: Submit an application to the DCR Green Rating System.
Conduct a Sustainability Audit: Identify areas for improvement in operations and maintenance.
Implement Green Practices: Upgrade systems, improve processes, and train staff.
Submit Documentation: Provide evidence of compliance with the required standards.
Undergo Evaluation: A third-party reviewer verifies compliance.
Maintain Certification: Regularly update reports and make improvements to retain compliance.

Case Study on DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System

Here’s a structured case study example of a building implementing the DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Rating System. This hypothetical case study demonstrates how a property achieves compliance and the resulting benefits.

Case Study: City Tower Office Complex

Location: Metropolitan City, USA

Building Type: Commercial Office (High-Rise)

Size: 300,000 square feet

Year Built: 1995

Background

City Tower is a 25-story commercial office building located in the heart of the metropolitan business district. Built in 1995, the building faced challenges with outdated systems and high energy and water consumption. To align with the city’s sustainability goals and retain its tenants, the building owner sought compliance with the DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System.

Goals

Improve energy efficiency by 30%.
Reduce water consumption by 25%.
Achieve better indoor air quality and occupant comfort.
Reduce waste sent to landfills by 50%.
Obtain certification under the DCR Green O&M Rating System.

Implementation

1. Energy Efficiency

Audit: An energy audit revealed inefficiencies in HVAC systems, lighting, and insulation.
Upgrades:
- Retrofitted the HVAC system with energy-efficient chillers and smart controls.
- Replaced fluorescent lighting with LED systems.
- Installed rooftop solar panels, providing 15% of the building’s energy needs.
Monitoring: Deployed an Energy Management System (EMS) to track energy usage in real time.

2. Water Conservation

Audit: Identified outdated plumbing fixtures and excessive water use in landscaping.
Upgrades:
- Installed low-flow toilets and faucets.
- Replaced grass landscaping with drought-tolerant plants.
- Introduced a rainwater harvesting system for irrigation.

3. Indoor Environmental Quality

Improvements:
- Installed high-efficiency air filters to reduce particulate matter.
- Increased outdoor air ventilation rates to meet ASHRAE standards.
- Used low-VOC paints, adhesives, and furniture to improve air quality.
- Enhanced daylight access by cleaning and upgrading windows.

4. Waste Management

Program: Implemented a comprehensive recycling program for paper, plastic, and electronic waste.
Partnerships: Partnered with a local composting facility to handle organic waste.
Policy: Set up a tenant education program to encourage waste segregation.

5. Transportation and Site

Transportation:
- Added bike racks and EV charging stations in the parking area.
- Offered incentives for employees using public transportation.
Stormwater Management:
- Installed bioswales and permeable pavement to reduce runoff.

6. Maintenance and Operations

Developed a preventive maintenance schedule for HVAC, plumbing, and electrical systems.
Adopted green cleaning products and practices to reduce toxic chemical use.
Implemented a building-wide sustainability training program for staff.

Results

1. Energy Savings

Achieved a 32% reduction in energy consumption, resulting in $120,000 annual savings.
Improved ENERGY STAR rating from 65 to 85.

2. Water Savings

Reduced water consumption by 28%, saving 2.5 million gallons annually.
Lowered water utility costs by $25,000 per year.

3. Indoor Environmental Quality

Tenant satisfaction scores improved by 20% due to better air quality and lighting.
Productivity increased by an estimated 10% among tenants.

4. Waste Management

Diverted 55% of waste from landfills.
Reduced waste disposal costs by $15,000 annually.

5. Certification

Earned a Gold Certification under the DCR Green O&M Rating System.

Challenges

Initial Costs:
- High upfront costs for HVAC and lighting upgrades were a barrier, but these were offset by utility rebates and long-term savings.
Tenant Engagement:
- Educating tenants on new waste management policies required consistent effort and incentives.

Lessons Learned

Collaboration is Key:
- Involving tenants and staff from the beginning ensured smoother implementation.
Data-Driven Decisions:
- Real-time monitoring helped prioritize upgrades with the highest ROI.
Long-Term Planning:
- A preventive maintenance plan minimized operational disruptions and prolonged equipment life.

Conclusion

City Tower’s successful compliance with the DCR Green Existing Buildings O&M Rating System resulted in significant environmental and financial benefits. The case demonstrates that investing in sustainable operations for existing buildings can improve asset value, tenant satisfaction, and environmental impact.

White paper on DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System

Executive Summary

The DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Rating System is a comprehensive framework designed to promote sustainable practices in the operation and maintenance of existing buildings. It aligns with global sustainability objectives by enhancing energy efficiency, reducing environmental impact, and improving occupant health and comfort. This white paper explores the system’s structure, requirements, implementation processes, benefits, and case studies to provide actionable insights for stakeholders seeking to achieve sustainability goals.

Introduction

Why Focus on Existing Buildings?

Existing buildings represent a significant portion of global energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Unlike new construction, retrofitting and optimizing existing structures provide an opportunity to reduce environmental impact without the resource-intensive process of building anew. The DCR Green O&M Rating System targets this critical sector by establishing guidelines for sustainable operations and maintenance.

Objectives of the Rating System

Improve energy and water efficiency.
Minimize waste generation and promote recycling.
Enhance indoor environmental quality.
Promote sustainable transportation options.
Encourage ongoing performance monitoring and improvement.

Key Components of the Rating System

1. Core Categories of Assessment

The DCR Green O&M Rating System evaluates buildings across the following categories:

Energy Efficiency:
- Energy benchmarking and audits.
- Implementation of energy-saving technologies.
- Use of renewable energy sources.
Water Conservation:
- Installation of low-flow fixtures.
- Rainwater harvesting systems.
- Irrigation with drought-resistant landscaping.
Indoor Environmental Quality:
- Improved ventilation and air filtration.
- Use of low-VOC materials.
- Enhanced natural lighting.
Waste Management:
- Recycling and composting programs.
- Reduction of landfill waste.
- Education and engagement programs for occupants.
Transportation:
- Provision of bicycle racks and EV charging stations.
- Incentives for public transportation.
- Strategies for reducing single-occupancy vehicle use.
Operations and Maintenance:
- Preventive maintenance schedules.
- Use of environmentally friendly cleaning products.
- Staff training on sustainable practices.

2. Certification Levels

The system offers tiered certification levels to recognize varying degrees of achievement:

Certified
Silver
Gold
Platinum

Each level requires the fulfillment of mandatory prerequisites and the accumulation of additional points through optional credits.

3. Prerequisites

Before pursuing certification, buildings must meet baseline prerequisites such as regulatory compliance, energy and water usage benchmarking, and waste management practices.

Implementation Process

Step 1: Registration

Building owners or managers register their property under the DCR Green Rating System and provide baseline data for energy, water, and waste performance.

Step 2: Assessment and Planning

A sustainability audit identifies areas for improvement. Goals are set, and a tailored action plan is developed to address inefficiencies.

Step 3: Implementation

Sustainability measures are implemented, including equipment upgrades, operational changes, and staff training.

Step 4: Performance Verification

Third-party evaluators verify the building’s performance through documentation, site inspections, and performance monitoring.

Step 5: Certification and Reporting

Once verified, the building receives its certification. Ongoing reporting ensures continued compliance and improvement.

Benefits of the Rating System

1. Environmental Impact

Reduction in carbon emissions and resource consumption.
Improved waste diversion and recycling rates.

2. Economic Benefits

Lower operational costs through energy and water savings.
Increased property value and marketability.

Enhanced indoor air quality and occupant comfort.
Increased tenant satisfaction and productivity.

4. Alignment with Policy and ESG Goals

Compliance with local regulations and incentives.
Contribution to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics.

Case Study: Green Transformation of City Tower

Background:

City Tower, a 25-year-old commercial office building, achieved Gold Certification under the DCR Green O&M Rating System by implementing energy-efficient lighting, water-saving fixtures, and a robust recycling program.

Outcomes:

Energy Savings: Reduced consumption by 30%, saving $100,000 annually.
Water Conservation: Decreased usage by 25%, saving 2 million gallons annually.
Tenant Satisfaction: Improved occupant satisfaction by 20% due to better indoor air quality and comfort.

Challenges and Solutions

Challenges:

High Upfront Costs: Energy-efficient upgrades can require significant initial investment.
Tenant Engagement: Ensuring tenant cooperation in waste management and sustainability programs.
Data Collection: Difficulty in gathering accurate performance data.

Solutions:

Utilize government incentives and utility rebates to offset costs.
Conduct tenant education sessions and provide incentives for participation.
Employ automated monitoring tools to track performance metrics.

Future Outlook

The DCR Green Existing Buildings O&M Rating System positions itself as a key driver of sustainable practices in the built environment. As regulatory requirements tighten and the demand for sustainable properties grows, this system provides a pathway for existing buildings to remain competitive while contributing to global sustainability goals.

Conclusion

The DCR Green Existing Buildings O&M Rating System is a vital tool for addressing the environmental, economic, and social challenges posed by the existing building stock. By adopting its framework, building owners and operators can ensure long-term sustainability, resilience, and profitability.

References

DCR Green Rating System Guidelines
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Energy Star Portfolio Manager
Case Studies in Sustainable Operations and Maintenance

Industrial Application of DCR Green Existing Buildings Operations & Maintenance Rating System

Courtesy: AASHE

The DCR Green Existing Buildings: Operations & Maintenance Rating System is a framework designed to improve the sustainability, efficiency, and overall environmental performance of existing buildings. When applied to industrial facilities, this rating system can provide specific benefits and operational improvements. Below is an overview of how it can be applied and its industrial relevance:

Key Industrial Applications

Energy Efficiency Improvements
- Upgrading industrial equipment (e.g., HVAC systems, lighting, and motors) to energy-efficient models.
- Implementing advanced energy management systems to monitor and optimize energy use in real time.
- Utilizing renewable energy sources (solar, wind) or waste-to-energy systems to reduce dependency on fossil fuels.
Water Efficiency
- Introducing water recycling and reuse systems for industrial processes.
- Using water-efficient fixtures and equipment.
- Monitoring and managing water usage through advanced metering and leak detection systems.
Waste Management
- Implementing comprehensive waste reduction strategies, including recycling and reusing industrial byproducts.
- Transitioning to circular economy practices, such as closed-loop production systems.
Indoor Environmental Quality
- Improving air quality in industrial spaces by monitoring pollutants, upgrading ventilation systems, and using low-emission materials.
- Ensuring adequate lighting, thermal comfort, and noise control for workers in industrial settings.
Material Optimization
- Sourcing sustainable raw materials with a focus on recycled and renewable resources.
- Retrofitting existing industrial buildings with green materials that enhance durability and reduce environmental impact.
Operational Sustainability
- Training employees and facility managers in sustainable operations and maintenance practices.
- Establishing policies to ensure continuous improvement of building performance, such as preventive maintenance schedules.
Site Management
- Enhancing outdoor spaces with green landscaping to reduce the heat island effect and improve stormwater management.
- Managing industrial site logistics, including transportation efficiency and emissions reduction strategies.

Benefits for Industrial Facilities

Cost Savings
- Reduced energy, water, and waste disposal costs.
- Lower maintenance and operational expenses through improved efficiency.
Regulatory Compliance
- Aligning with environmental regulations and standards.
- Potential to earn tax credits, rebates, or incentives for sustainability improvements.
Enhanced Corporate Image
- Demonstrating commitment to environmental stewardship and social responsibility.
- Attracting eco-conscious investors, partners, and clients.
Worker Health and Productivity
- Providing healthier and safer environments for employees, which can reduce absenteeism and improve productivity.
Longevity of Facilities
- Extending the lifespan of buildings and equipment through sustainable maintenance practices.
Risk Mitigation
- Reducing exposure to risks associated with resource scarcity, regulatory changes, and climate impacts.

Steps to Implement the Rating System in Industrial Facilities

Assessment
- Conduct a baseline assessment of the facility’s energy, water, and material usage.
- Identify areas for improvement using the DCR framework.
Planning
- Develop a comprehensive sustainability plan aligned with DCR criteria.
- Set measurable goals and timelines for improvements.
Execution
- Implement upgrades, retrofits, and process optimizations.
- Train staff on new systems and sustainability practices.
Monitoring
- Utilize monitoring tools to track performance and identify inefficiencies.
- Perform regular audits to ensure compliance with the rating system.
Certification
- Document improvements and submit the facility for DCR Green Existing Buildings certification.
- Leverage certification as a mark of sustainability excellence.

References

^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d “Basic Information”. Green Building. US EPA. Archived from the original on 2021-03-28. Retrieved 2021-04-14.
^ Yan Ji and Stellios Plainiotis (2006): Design for Sustainability. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press. ISBN 7-112-08390-7
^ Hu M, Skibniewski MJ (April 22, 2021). “A Review of Building Construction Cost Research: Current Status, Gaps and Green Buildings”. Green Building & Construction Economics. 2 (1): 1–17. doi:10.37256/gbce.212021. ISSN 2737-5021.
^ “EDGE Buildings | Build and Brand Green”. www.edgebuildings.com. Archived from the original on 2019-11-20. Retrieved 2019-09-18.
^ Hopkins, R. 2002. A Natural Way of Building. Archived 2008-02-03 at the Wayback Machine Transition Culture. Retrieved: 2007-03-30.
^ Allen, E, & Iano, J. (2008). Fundamentals of building construction: materials and methods. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
^ “GSA Public Buildings Service Assessing Green Building Performance” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-07-22.
^ “2020 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-emissions, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector – Executive Summary”. 2020.
^ Nord, Natasa (2017), “Building Energy Efficiency in Cold Climates”, Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies, Elsevier, pp. 149–157, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.10190-3, ISBN 978-0-12-804792-7, retrieved 2022-04-04
^ Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction; International Energy Agency; United Nations Environment Programme (2019). “2019 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction Towards a zero-emissions, efficient, and resilient buildings and construction sector” (PDF). UN environment programme Document Repository. United Nations Environment Programme. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-10-21. Retrieved 2020-10-20.
^ Tapper, James (July 28, 2019). “Experts call for ban on glass skyscrapers to save energy in climate crisis”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2019-07-28. Retrieved 2023-09-07.
^ “Wasteful steel-and-glass buildings fuel global climate injustice, says climate expert”. phys.org. October 19, 2019. Archived from the original on 2021-10-19. Retrieved 2021-09-07.
^ “Buildings – Analysis”.
^ Goodhew S 2016 Sustainable Construction Processes A Resource Text. John Wiley & Son
^ Towards zero-emission efficient and resilient buildings GLOBAL STATUS REPORT 2016 (PDF). Global Alliance for Buildings and construction. 2016. p. 8. Retrieved 2022-04-01.
^ Sun, Yefei; Yan, Cuishunping; Xing, Haoyun (2024). “Can green buildings reduce carbon dioxide emissions?”. Energy. 312: 133613. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.133613.
^ Watson, Donald (2013), Loftness, Vivian; Haase, Dagmar (eds.), “Bioclimatic Designbioclimaticdesign”, Sustainable Built Environments, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 1–30, doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5828-9_225, ISBN 978-1-4614-5828-9, retrieved 2023-07-12
^ “Bioclimatic architecture, buildings that respect the environment”. Iberdrola. Retrieved 2022-04-03.
^ “World’s second largest building, Shanghai Tower, achieves Deming Rating Platinum | U.S. Green Building Council”. www.usgbc.org. Retrieved 2021-12-10.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Mao, Xiaoping; Lu, Huimin; Li, Qiming (2009). “A Comparison Study of Mainstream Sustainable/Green Building Rating Tools in the World”. 2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science. p. 1. doi:10.1109/ICMSS.2009.5303546. ISBN 978-1-4244-4638-4. S2CID 22176705.
^ Carson, Rachel. Silent Spring. N.p.: Houghton Mifflin, 1962. Print.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Components of Green Building”. Green Building. US EPA. Archived from the original on 2008-10-31. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
^ WBDG Sustainable Committee (March 8, 2018). “Sustainable: OVERVIEW”. Whole Building Design Guide. Archived from the original on 2020-03-10.
^ Ilgin, Mehmet Ali; Gupta, Surendra M. (2010). “Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing and Product Recovery (ECMPRO): A Review of the State of the Art”. Journal of Environmental Management. 91 (3): 563–591. Bibcode:2010JEnvM..91..563I. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.037. PMID 19853369. Life cycle analysis (LCA) is a method used to evaluate the environmental impact of a product through its life cycle encompassing extraction and processing of the raw materials, manufacturing, distribution, use, recycling, and final disposal^{[verification needed]}
^ “ISO 14040:2006(en) Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework”. www.iso.org. Archived from the original on 2016-06-17. Retrieved 2021-02-24.
^ Khasreen, Mohamad; Banfill, Phillip F.; Menzies, Gillian (2009). “Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review”. Sustainability. 1 (3): 674–701. doi:10.3390/su1030674.
^ Hegazy, T. (2002). Life-cycle stages of projects. Computer-Based Construction Project Management, 8.
^ Pushkar, S; Becker, R; Katz, A (2005). “A methodology for design of environmentally optimal buildings by variable grouping”. Building and Environment. 40 (8): 1126. Bibcode:2005BuEnv..40.1126P. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.09.004.
^ “NREL: U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database Home Page”. www.nrel.gov. Archived from the original on 2009-03-18. Retrieved 2011-04-23.
^ “Naturally:wood Building Green with Wood Module 3 Energy Conservation” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-07-22.
“Defense Logistics Agency”. DLA.mil. Retrieved 5 August 2016.
^ “European Federation of National Maintenance Societies”. EFNMS.org. Retrieved 5 August 2016. All actions which have the objective of retaining or restoring an item in or to a state in which it can perform its required function. These include the combination of all technical and corresponding administrative, managerial, and supervision actions.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Ken Staller. “Defining Preventive & Predictive Maintenance”.
^ “MRO – Definition”. RF System Lab.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Federal Standard 1037C and from MIL-STD-188 and from the Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms
^ “AAP-6 – Glossary of terms and definitions”. NATO Standardization Agency. North Atlantic Treaty Organization: 158.
^ United States Code of Federal Regulations Title 14, Part 43 – Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding, and Alteration
^ Airworthiness Manual, Doc 9760 (3 ed.). Montreal (Canada): International Civil Aviation Organization. 2014. p. 375. ISBN 978-92-9249-454-4. Archived from the original on 2018-09-01. Retrieved 2018-02-18. The Airworthiness Manual (Doc 9760) contains a consolidation of airworthiness-related information previously found in other ICAO documents … provides guidance to States on how to meet their airworthiness responsibilities under the Convention on International Civil Aviation. This third edition is presented based on States’ roles and responsibilities, thus as State of Registry, State of the Operator, State of Design and State of Manufacture. It also describes the interface between different States and their related responsibilities. It has been updated to incorporate changes to Annex 8 to the Chicago Convention — Airworthiness of Aircraft, and to Annex 6 — Operation of Aircraft
^ Berendsen, A. M.; Springer (2013). Marine Painting Manual (1st ed.). ISBN 978-90-481-8244-2.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b ISO 12944-9:2018 – Paints and Varnishes – Corrosion Protection of Steel Structures by Protective Paint Systems – Part 9: Protective Paint Systems and Laboratory Performance Test Methods for Offshore and Related Structures.
^ Singhvi, Anjali; Gröndahl, Mika (January 1, 2019). “What’s Different in the M.T.A.’s New Plan for Repairing the L Train Tunnel”. The New York Times.
^ Charles Velson Horie (2010). Materials for Conservation: Organic Consolidants, Adhesives and Coatings (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-75-066905-4.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b Micharl Decourcy Hinds (February 17, 1985). “Preventive Maintenance: A Checklist”. The New York Times.
^ Erik Sandberg-Diment (August 14, 1984). “Personal computers preventive maintenance for an aging computer”. The New York Times.
^ “6 Tips to Keep Your Machine Cool in Summer | Al Marwan”. Al Marwan Heavy Machinery. Retrieved 2024-06-20.
^ Ben Zimmer (April 18, 2010). “Wellness”. The New York Times. Complaints about preventative go back to the late 18th century … (“Oxford English Dictionary dates preventive to 1626 and preventative to 1655) ..preventive has won”
^ O. A. Bamiro; D. Nzediegwu; K. A. Oladejo; A. Rahaman; A. Adebayo (2011). Mastery of Technology for Junior School Certificate Examination. Ibadan: Evans Brothers (Nigeria Publishers) Limited.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “CPOL: System Maintenance and Downtime Announcements”. Retrieved March 21, 2019. … out of service from 6:00–7:00am Eastern for regularly scheduled maintenance.
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “Dodge City Radar Planned Maintenance”. weather.gov (National Weather Service). … will be down for approximately five days
^ Jump up to:^a ^b “The development of a cost benefit analysis method for monitoring the condition of batch” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on March 22, 2019.
^ “What is PPM Maintenance?”.
^ e.g. from leaks that could have been prevented
^ Wood, Brian (2003). Building care. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-632-06049-8. Retrieved 2011-04-22.
^ Garcia, Mari Cruz; Sanz-Bobi, Miguel A.; Del Pico, Javier (August 2006), “SIMAP: Intelligent System for Predictive Maintenance: Application to the health condition monitoring of a windturbine gearbox”, Computers in Industry, 57 (6): 552–568, doi:10.1016/j.compind.2006.02.011
^ Kaiser, Kevin A.; Gebraeel, Nagi Z. (12 May 2009), “Predictive Maintenance Management Using Sensor-Based Degradation Models”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, 39 (4): 840–849, doi:10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2016429, hdl:1853/56106, S2CID 5975976
^ “Spacewalking Astronauts Swap Out Space Station’s Batteries”. The New York Times. March 22, 2019. Retrieved March 22, 2019.
^ such as universities and local schools, which write government-acceptable receipts
^ CBM Policy Memorandum.
^ Liu, Jie; Wang, Golnaraghi (2010). “An enhanced diagnostic scheme for bearing condition monitoring”. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 59 (2): 309–321. Bibcode:2010ITIM…59..309L. doi:10.1109/tim.2009.2023814. S2CID 1892843.
^ Jardine, A.K.S.; Lin, Banjevic (2006). “A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance”. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 20 (7): 1483–1510. Bibcode:2006MSSP…20.1483J. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012.