Eco-friendly Housekeeping Chemicals- Here are some eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals that are safe for you, your family, and the environment:

• All-Purpose Cleaner:
  • Ingredients: White vinegar, baking soda, essential oils (optional)
  • How to use: Mix equal parts vinegar and water in a spray bottle. Add a few drops of your favorite essential oil for fragrance. Use on most surfaces. For tougher messes, add a tablespoon of baking soda to the spray bottle.
• Glass Cleaner:
  • Ingredients: White vinegar, water, newspaper  
  • How to use: Mix equal parts vinegar and water in a spray bottle. Spray on glass and wipe clean with newspaper for streak-free shine.
• Toilet Bowl Cleaner:
  • Ingredients: Baking soda, vinegar, essential oils (optional)  
  • How to use: Pour 1/2 cup of baking soda into the toilet bowl. Add 1/2 cup of vinegar. Let it fizz for 30 minutes, then scrub and flush.
• Floor Cleaner:
  • Ingredients: White vinegar, water, essential oils (optional)
  • How to use: Mix 1/2 cup of vinegar with 1 gallon of warm water in a bucket. Add a few drops of your favorite essential oil. Mop floors as usual.
• Dish Soap:
  • Ingredients: Castile soap, water, essential oils (optional)
  • How to use: Mix 1 tablespoon of castile soap with 1 cup of hot water in a soap dispenser. Add a few drops of your favorite essential oil.
• Laundry Detergent:
  • Ingredients: Borax, washing soda, grated soap flakes, essential oils (optional)
  • How to use: Mix 1/4 cup of borax, 1/4 cup of washing soda, and 1/4 cup of grated soap flakes in a jar. Add a few drops of your favorite essential oil. Use 1-2 tablespoons per load of laundry.

Tips for using eco-friendly cleaning products:

• Read labels carefully: Look for products that are plant-based, biodegradable, and free of harsh chemicals.
• Dilute products as directed: Using too much product can be wasteful and harmful to the environment.
• Store products properly: Keep products out of reach of children and pets.  
• Choose refillable containers: This can help to reduce plastic waste.  
• Consider making your own cleaning products: This is a great way to save money and know exactly what’s in your products.

By using eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals, you can help to protect the environment and keep your home healthy and safe.

What is Required Eco-friendly Housekeeping Chemicals

Eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals prioritize using ingredients that are safe for humans, animals, and the environment. Here’s what typically constitutes eco-friendly cleaning products:  

• Plant-based ingredients:
  • Key examples:
    • Vinegar: Cuts grease, disinfects, deodorizes.  
    • Baking soda: Deodorizes, scrubs, softens water.  
    • Essential oils: Add fragrance, some have antibacterial properties.  
    • Castile soap: Derived from plants, gentle on skin.  
    • Coconut oil: Can be used as a polish or for removing sticky residue.  
• Biodegradability:
  • Products should break down naturally in the environment without harming waterways or soil.  
• Minimal or no harsh chemicals:
  • Avoid:
    • Phosphates: Can cause water pollution.  
    • Chlorine bleach: Toxic to aquatic life.  
    • Ammonia: Can release harmful fumes.  
    • Phthalates: Endocrine disruptors.  
    • Artificial fragrances: Often contain chemicals that can irritate skin or lungs.  
• Recyclable packaging:
  • Choose products in containers made from recycled materials.
• Certifications: Look for certifications like:
  • USDA Organic: Meets strict standards for organic ingredients.
  • EPA Safer Choice: Meets EPA standards for human health and environmental safety.  
  • Green Seal: Independent certification for environmental and health standards.  

Important Note: Even “natural” products can have limitations. Always test in an inconspicuous area first, especially on delicate surfaces.  

By choosing eco-friendly cleaning products, you can reduce your environmental impact and create a healthier home for yourself and your family.

Who is Required Eco-friendly Housekeeping Chemicals

Courtesy: Chemical Laboratory

While there aren’t always strict legal requirements for everyone to use eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals, there are several groups and situations where their use is highly encouraged or even mandated:

• Businesses and Institutions:
  • Hotels: Often adopt eco-friendly practices to attract eco-conscious travelers and meet sustainability goals.  
  • Hospitals: Prioritize safety and hygiene, and eco-friendly products can minimize exposure to harsh chemicals for patients and staff.  
  • Schools: Protect the health of children and teachers, and align with educational goals of environmental awareness.  
  • Government buildings: May have sustainability policies that encourage or require the use of eco-friendly products.
• Individuals with Health Concerns:
  • People with allergies, asthma, or sensitive skin may find that eco-friendly products reduce irritation and improve indoor air quality.  
• Environmentally Conscious Individuals:
  • Many people choose eco-friendly products as a personal choice to minimize their environmental impact and support sustainable practices.  
• Regulations and Certifications:
  • Some regions or countries may have regulations that limit the use of certain chemicals in cleaning products.
  • Certifications like Green Seal or EPA Safer Choice can help consumers identify truly eco-friendly options.  

Keep in mind: The specific requirements for eco-friendly cleaning products can vary depending on the location and industry.

When is Required Eco-friendly Housekeeping Chemicals

Eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals are required or highly recommended in situations where:

• Environmental Protection is Critical:
  • Sensitive Ecosystems: Areas with fragile ecosystems, like national parks or coastal regions, may have regulations or guidelines for using eco-friendly products to minimize environmental impact.
  • Water Protection: Areas with sensitive water sources, such as lakes, rivers, or groundwater, may require the use of products that minimize water pollution.
• Human Health is a Priority:
  • Healthcare Settings: Hospitals, clinics, and long-term care facilities often prioritize the use of eco-friendly products to minimize exposure to harsh chemicals for patients and staff.  
  • Schools and Childcare Facilities: Protecting the health of children is crucial, and eco-friendly products can reduce exposure to harmful chemicals.  
  • Individuals with Sensitivities: People with allergies, asthma, or sensitive skin may require the use of eco-friendly products to avoid irritation and maintain a healthy indoor environment.  
• Compliance with Regulations:
  • Some regions or countries may have specific regulations that mandate the use of eco-friendly products or restrict the use of certain chemicals in cleaning products.
  • Businesses and institutions may have internal sustainability policies that require the use of eco-friendly products.
• Corporate Social Responsibility:
  • Many businesses and organizations are increasingly adopting eco-friendly practices as part of their corporate social responsibility initiatives.  

I hope this provides a clearer understanding of when eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals are required or highly recommended.

Where is Required Eco-friendly Housekeeping Chemicals

Eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals are often required or strongly recommended in these specific locations:

• Healthcare Facilities: Hospitals, clinics, and long-term care facilities prioritize patient and staff safety.  
• Schools and Childcare Centers: Protecting the health of children is paramount.  
• Government Buildings: Many government agencies have sustainability policies that encourage or mandate eco-friendly products.  
• Businesses with Sustainability Goals: Hotels, restaurants, and other businesses may use eco-friendly products to attract eco-conscious customers and meet sustainability targets.  
• Areas with Sensitive Ecosystems: Locations near water bodies, national parks, or other sensitive environments may have regulations to protect the environment.

How is Required Eco-friendly Housekeeping Chemicals

Courtesy: AspenClean West Vancouver

Eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals are required or strongly recommended in situations where:

• Environmental Protection is Critical:
  • Sensitive Ecosystems: Areas with fragile ecosystems, like national parks or coastal regions, may have regulations or guidelines for using eco-friendly products to minimize environmental impact.
  • Water Protection: Areas with sensitive water sources, such as lakes, rivers, or groundwater, may require the use of products that minimize water pollution.
• Human Health is a Priority:
  • Healthcare Settings: Hospitals, clinics, and long-term care facilities often prioritize the use of eco-friendly products to minimize exposure to harsh chemicals for patients and staff.  
  • Schools and Childcare Facilities: Protecting the health of children is crucial, and eco-friendly products can reduce exposure to harmful chemicals.  
  • Individuals with Sensitivities: People with allergies, asthma, or sensitive skin may require the use of eco-friendly products to avoid irritation and maintain a healthy indoor environment.  
• Compliance with Regulations:
  • Some regions or countries may have specific regulations that mandate the use of eco-friendly products or restrict the use of certain chemicals in cleaning products.
  • Businesses and institutions may have internal sustainability policies that require the use of eco-friendly products.
• Corporate Social Responsibility:
  • Many businesses and organizations are increasingly adopting eco-friendly practices as part of their corporate social responsibility initiatives.  

I hope this provides a clearer understanding of when eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals are required or highly recommended.

Case Study on Eco-friendly Housekeeping Chemicals

Eco-Friendly Cleaning at a Large Hotel Chain

Background:

A major international hotel chain faced increasing pressure from guests and investors to enhance its environmental sustainability. They recognized that their housekeeping department, with its extensive use of traditional cleaning chemicals, presented a significant environmental impact.

Challenges:

• Environmental Impact: Traditional cleaning products often contain harsh chemicals that can pollute waterways, harm wildlife, and contribute to air and water pollution.  
• Guest Concerns: Growing guest awareness of environmental issues led to increased demand for eco-friendly practices.  
• Brand Reputation: The hotel chain sought to enhance its brand image by demonstrating a commitment to sustainability.

Solution:

The hotel chain embarked on a comprehensive program to transition to eco-friendly cleaning practices across all its properties. This involved:

1. Product Sourcing: A thorough evaluation of eco-friendly cleaning products was conducted, focusing on:
   • Ingredient Safety: Prioritizing plant-based ingredients and avoiding harmful chemicals like phosphates, chlorine bleach, and phthalates.
   • Biodegradability: Ensuring products break down safely in the environment.
   • Packaging: Choosing products with minimal packaging and recyclable containers.
2. Staff Training: Extensive training programs were developed for housekeeping staff on:
   • Proper usage of eco-friendly products: Including dilution techniques and safe handling practices.
   • Environmental benefits of eco-friendly cleaning: Raising awareness of the impact of their work on the environment.
   • Waste reduction techniques: Implementing strategies to minimize waste generation.
3. Pilot Program: A pilot program was implemented in select hotels to test the effectiveness and feasibility of the new cleaning protocols.
4. Monitoring and Evaluation: Ongoing monitoring and evaluation were conducted to track progress, identify any challenges, and make necessary adjustments.
5. Guest Communication: The hotel chain communicated its commitment to eco-friendly cleaning practices to guests through brochures, website information, and in-room signage.

Results:

• Reduced Environmental Impact: The hotel chain significantly reduced its environmental impact by minimizing the use of harmful chemicals and reducing waste.
• Improved Guest Satisfaction: Guests expressed positive feedback on the hotel chain’s commitment to sustainability, leading to increased guest loyalty.
• Enhanced Brand Image: The initiative strengthened the hotel chain’s brand image as an environmentally responsible and socially conscious company.
• Cost Savings: In some cases, the use of more concentrated eco-friendly products resulted in cost savings due to reduced usage.

Conclusion:

This case study demonstrates the successful implementation of eco-friendly cleaning practices within a large-scale commercial setting. By prioritizing environmental sustainability, the hotel chain achieved significant benefits, including improved guest satisfaction, enhanced brand reputation, and reduced environmental impact.

Note: This is a fictionalized case study for illustrative purposes. Actual results may vary depending on the specific circumstances and implementation strategies.

White paper on Eco-friendly Housekeeping Chemicals

The Rise of Eco-Friendly Housekeeping Chemicals

1. Introduction

Traditional housekeeping chemicals often contain harsh ingredients that can harm human health and the environment. This white paper explores the growing trend of eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals, examining their benefits, challenges, and implications for the future.

2. Defining Eco-Friendly Housekeeping Chemicals

Eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals prioritize:

• Plant-based ingredients: Utilizing natural ingredients like vinegar, baking soda, essential oils, and plant-derived surfactants.
• Biodegradability: Ensuring products break down naturally in the environment without harming waterways or soil.
• Minimal or no harsh chemicals: Avoiding harmful substances such as phosphates, chlorine bleach, ammonia, phthalates, and artificial fragrances.
• Recyclable packaging: Minimizing packaging waste and promoting the use of recycled materials.
• Certifications: Seeking certifications from organizations like USDA Organic, EPA Safer Choice, and Green Seal, which guarantee adherence to strict environmental and health standards.

3. Benefits of Eco-Friendly Housekeeping Chemicals

• Environmental Protection:
  • Reduces water and air pollution.
  • Protects aquatic life and wildlife.
  • Conserves natural resources.
• Human Health:
  • Minimizes exposure to harmful chemicals that can irritate skin, eyes, and respiratory systems.
  • Improves indoor air quality.
  • Reduces the risk of allergic reactions.
• Social Responsibility:
  • Supports sustainable business practices.
  • Aligns with consumer demand for ethical and environmentally conscious products.

4. Challenges and Considerations

• Effectiveness: Some consumers may perceive eco-friendly products as less effective than traditional options.
• Cost: Eco-friendly products can sometimes be more expensive than conventional ones.
• Availability: While the market for eco-friendly products is growing, they may not always be readily available in all regions.
• Certification Standards: A lack of consistent and universally recognized standards can make it difficult for consumers to identify truly eco-friendly products.

5. The Future of Eco-Friendly Housekeeping Chemicals

• Increased Demand: Growing consumer awareness and demand for sustainable products will drive further growth in the market for eco-friendly cleaning products.
• Innovation: Continued research and development will lead to the creation of more effective and affordable eco-friendly cleaning solutions.
• Industry Collaboration: Collaboration between manufacturers, retailers, and consumers is crucial to promote the adoption of eco-friendly practices.
• Regulatory Support: Government regulations and incentives can play a significant role in encouraging the development and use of eco-friendly cleaning products.

6. Conclusion

The use of eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals is not just a trend; it is a crucial step towards a more sustainable and healthy future. By embracing these products, individuals, businesses, and institutions can contribute to a cleaner environment, protect human health, and promote responsible consumption.

7. Recommendations

• Consumers:
  • Choose eco-friendly products whenever possible.
  • Read labels carefully and look for certifications.
  • Consider making your own cleaning products using natural ingredients.
• Businesses:
  • Implement policies that prioritize the use of eco-friendly cleaning products.
  • Train staff on the proper use and handling of these products.
  • Communicate their commitment to sustainability to customers.
• Government:
  • Develop and enforce regulations that promote the use of eco-friendly cleaning products.
  • Provide incentives for businesses and individuals to adopt sustainable cleaning practices.

This white paper provides a general overview of eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals. Further research and ongoing evaluation are necessary to fully understand the long-term impacts and potential of these products.

Disclaimer: This white paper is for informational purposes only and should not be considered professional advice.

Note: This white paper provides a basic framework. You can expand on it by:

• Including specific case studies of successful implementations of eco-friendly cleaning programs.
• Adding data and statistics on the environmental impact of traditional cleaning products.
• Discussing the role of technology in developing and delivering eco-friendly cleaning solutions.
• Addressing potential concerns and misconceptions about eco-friendly cleaning products.

I hope this white paper provides a valuable resource for understanding the importance of eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals.

Industrial Application of Eco-friendly Housekeeping Chemicals

Courtesy: PJP, An Envoy Solutions Company

Eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals find diverse applications across various industrial sectors, offering significant benefits in terms of environmental sustainability, worker safety, and brand image. Here are some key areas:

1. Manufacturing:

• Heavy Industry: In factories, warehouses, and production plants, eco-friendly cleaners are used to clean machinery, floors, and work surfaces. They minimize the risk of exposure to harmful fumes for workers and reduce the environmental impact of industrial waste.  
• Food Processing: The food and beverage industry demands high hygiene standards. Eco-friendly cleaners ensure food safety without compromising on cleanliness. They are often used to sanitize equipment, floors, and packaging areas.  
• Electronics Manufacturing: In electronics manufacturing, eco-friendly cleaners are crucial for cleaning delicate equipment and preventing damage to sensitive components.

2. Healthcare:

• Hospitals and Clinics: Hospitals prioritize patient and staff safety. Eco-friendly cleaners minimize exposure to harsh chemicals, reducing the risk of respiratory issues and skin irritations. They also contribute to a healthier indoor environment.  
• Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: The pharmaceutical industry requires a high level of cleanliness and hygiene. Eco-friendly cleaners help maintain a sterile environment while minimizing the risk of contamination.  

3. Hospitality:

• Hotels and Resorts: Hotels often adopt eco-friendly practices to attract eco-conscious travelers. Eco-friendly cleaners are used to clean guest rooms, public areas, and back-of-house facilities.  
• Restaurants: Restaurants utilize eco-friendly cleaners to sanitize kitchen surfaces, dining areas, and restrooms while ensuring food safety.  

4. Transportation:

• Airlines and Airports: Airports and airlines are increasingly adopting eco-friendly cleaning practices. Eco-friendly cleaners are used to clean aircraft cabins, terminals, and other airport facilities.  
• Public Transportation: Buses, trains, and subways require regular cleaning. Eco-friendly cleaners help maintain a clean and hygienic environment for passengers while minimizing environmental impact.  

5. Commercial Buildings:

• Office Buildings: Eco-friendly cleaners are used to clean office spaces, restrooms, and common areas, creating a healthier and more sustainable work environment.  

Key Benefits of Using Eco-Friendly Housekeeping Chemicals in Industrial Settings:

• Reduced Environmental Impact: Minimize pollution of water, air, and soil.  
• Improved Worker Safety: Reduce exposure to harmful chemicals, improving worker health and well-being.  
• Enhanced Brand Image: Demonstrate a commitment to sustainability and corporate social responsibility.  
• Cost Savings: In some cases, eco-friendly products can be more cost-effective in the long run due to reduced usage and lower disposal costs.  
• Compliance with Regulations: Adhere to environmental regulations and industry standards.  

Conclusion:

The use of eco-friendly housekeeping chemicals is becoming increasingly important in industrial settings. By prioritizing sustainability and worker safety, industries can contribute to a healthier environment and improve their overall environmental performance.  

Disclaimer: This information is for general knowledge and informational purposes only. For specific applications and safety guidelines, always refer to the manufacturer’s instructions and consult with relevant safety and environmental regulations.

References

1. ^ “Defining Green Cleaning And Why It’s Important”. cleanlink.com. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 26 July 2018.
2. ^ Aguirre, Sarah (12 July 2022). “What Is Green Cleaning?”. The Spruce. Retrieved 5 May 2023.
3. ^ “Summary of the Toxic Substances Control Act”. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 22 February 2013. Retrieved 5 May 2023.
4. ^ Kocsis, Anne (2010). The Complete Guide to Eco-Friendly House Cleaning: Everything You Need to Know Explained Simply. Atlantic Publishing Company. p. 60. ISBN 978-1-60138-366-2.
5. ^ Jump up to:^a b c “Bill Text – SB-258 Cleaning Product Right to Know Act of 2017”. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. Archived from the original on 6 May 2017. Retrieved 14 July 2018.
6. ^ Jump up to:^a b “Governor Brown Signs Cleaning Product Right to Know Act to Create First-in-Nation Label Law for Consumers”. Senator Ricardo Lara (Press release). Archived from the original on 17 October 2017. Retrieved 14 July 2018.
7. ^ “Earth Friendly Products Celebrates Passage of California’s Historic Ingredient Transparency Legislation”. ecos.com (Press release). 17 October 2017. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 14 July 2018.
8. ^ “Governor Brown Signs Cleaning Products Right to Know Act”. American Sustainable Business Council. Archived from the original on 3 November 2017. Retrieved 14 July 2018.
9. ^ “SC Johnson Applauds California’s Passing of Cleaning Product Right to Know Act”. prnewswire.com (Press release). Retrieved 14 July 2018.
10. ^ Anderson, Corey (11 February 2014). “S.C. Johnson integrating Caldrea/Mrs. Meyer’s in Racine, ceasing Minneapolis operations”. MinnPost. Retrieved 14 July 2018.
11. ^ “SC Johnson Signs Agreement to Acquire Method and Ecover”. SC Johnson (Press release). 14 September 2017. Retrieved 14 July 2018.
12. Denis Bégin; Caroline Couture; Michel Gérin; Maximilien Debia (2020). Solvants verts: fondements, santé, sécurité, environnement et substitution (in French). Montréal, QC, CA: Université de Montréal. Département de santé environnementale et santé au travail, IRSST, Bibliothèque numérique canadienne. ISBN 9782897971113. OCLC 1162187204.
13. ^ “3.2 TOOLS OF GREEN CHEMISTRY” (PDF). Bharathidasan University. 2016-12-23. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
14. ^ Lavoué, J.; Bégin, D.; Géerin, M. (2003). “Technical, Occupational Health and Environmental Aspects of Metal Degreasing with Aqueous Cleaners”. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 47 (6): 441–459. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meg057. ISSN 1475-3162. PMID 12890654.
15. ^ Martín, Ángel; José Cocero, María (2016). “Supercritical Fluids”. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 1–28. doi:10.1002/0471238961.1921160504092415.a01.pub3. ISBN 9780471238966.
16. ^ Lumia, Guy (2002). “Utilisation du CO2 supercritique comme solvant de substitution”. Environnement. doi:10.51257/a-v1-in5. S2CID 171743208.
17. ^ “Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail (IRSST)”, The Grants Register 2021, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 452–453, 2020, doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95988-4_465, ISBN 978-1-349-95987-7
18. ^ Saxena, Neha; Pal, Nilanjan; Ojha, Keka; Dey, Swapan; Mandal, Ajay (2018-07-02). “Synthesis, characterization, physical and thermodynamic properties of a novel anionic surfactant derived from Sapindus laurifolius”. RSC Advances. 8 (43): 24485–24499. Bibcode:2018RSCAd…824485S. doi:10.1039/C8RA03888K. ISSN 2046-2069. PMC 9082051. PMID 35539155.
19. ^ Gu, Yanlong; Jérôme, François (2013). “Bio-based solvents: an emerging generation of fluids for the design of eco-efficient processes in catalysis and organic chemistry”. Chemical Society Reviews. 42 (24): 9550–9570. doi:10.1039/c3cs60241a. ISSN 0306-0012. PMID 24056753.
20. ^ Jump up to:^a b Omar, Karzan A.; Sadeghi, Rahmat (2022). “Physicochemical properties of deep eutectic solvents: A review”. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 360: 119524. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119524. S2CID 249384715.
21. ^ Smith, Emma L.; Abbott, Andrew P.; Ryder, Karl S. (2014). “Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) and Their Applications”. Chemical Reviews. 114 (21): 11060–11082. doi:10.1021/cr300162p. hdl:2381/37428.
22. ^ Jump up to:^a b Winterton, Neil (2021). “The green solvent: a critical perspective”. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 23 (9): 2499–2522. doi:10.1007/s10098-021-02188-8. ISSN 1618-9558. PMC 8482956. PMID 34608382. S2CID 238233639.
23. ^ Sell, Charles S. (2006). “Terpenoids”. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/0471238961.2005181602120504.a01.pub2. ISBN 0471238961.
24. ^ Jump up to:^a b Gscheidmeier, Manfred; Fleig, Helmut (2000). “Turpentines”. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. doi:10.1002/14356007.a27_267. ISBN 978-3-527-30673-2.
25. ^ Boutekedjiret, Chahrazed; Vian, Maryline Abert; Chemat, Farid (2014), “Terpenes as Green Solvents for Natural Products Extraction”, Alternative Solvents for Natural Products Extraction, Green Chemistry and Sustainable Technology, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 205–219, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43628-8_9, ISBN 978-3-662-43627-1
26. ^ “Turpentine (8006-64-2)”, Chemical Effects in Biological Systems (CEBS), Research Triangle Park, NC (USA): National Toxicology Program (NTP), 2017, doi:10.22427/NTP-DATA-DTXSID6027717
27. ^ Cvjetko Bubalo, Marina; Vidović, Senka; Radojčić Redovniković, Ivana; Jokić, Stela (2015). “Green solvents for green technologies”. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology. 90 (9): 1631–1639. doi:10.1002/jctb.4668. ISSN 0268-2575. S2CID 97363599.
28. ^ Jessop, Philip G.; Mercer, Sean M.; Heldebrant, David J. (2012). “CO2-triggered switchable solvents, surfactants, and other materials”. Energy & Environmental Science. 5 (6): 7240–7253. doi:10.1039/C2EE02912J. ISSN 1754-5706.
29. ^ Bayart, Marie; Foruzanmehr, M. Reza; Vuillaume, Pascal Y.; Ovlaque, Pierre; Robert, Mathieu; Elkoun, Saïd (2021). “Poly(lactic acid)/flax composites: effect of surface modification and thermal treatment on interfacial adhesion, crystallization, microstructure, and mechanical properties”. Composite Interfaces. 29 (1): 17–36. doi:10.1080/09276440.2021.1884470. ISSN 0927-6440. S2CID 233830208.
30. ^ Jin, Saimeng; Byrne, Fergal; McElroy, Con Robert; Sherwood, James; Clark, James H.; Hunt, Andrew J. (2017). “Challenges in the development of bio-based solvents: a case study on methyl(2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methyl carbonate as an alternative aprotic solvent” (PDF). Faraday Discussions. 202: 157–173. Bibcode:2017FaDi..202..157J. doi:10.1039/c7fd00049a. ISSN 1359-6640. PMID 28661518.
31. ^ Byrne, Fergal P.; Jin, Saimeng; Paggiola, Giulia; Petchey, Tabitha H. M.; Clark, James H.; Farmer, Thomas J.; Hunt, Andrew J.; Robert McElroy, C.; Sherwood, James (2016). “Tools and techniques for solvent selection: green solvent selection guides”. Sustainable Chemical Processes. 4 (1). doi:10.1186/s40508-016-0051-z. ISSN 2043-7129. S2CID 56045622.
32. ^ Sustainable Solvents. Green Chemistry Series. 2017. doi:10.1039/9781782624035. ISBN 978-1-78262-335-9. ISSN 1757-7047.
33. ^ “Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail (IRSST)”, The Grants Register 2022, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 494–495, 2021, doi:10.1057/978-1-349-96042-2_6517, ISBN 978-1-349-96041-5
34. ^ Bisson Desrochers, Alexandra; Rouleau, Isabelle; Angehrn, Andréanne; Vasiliadis, Helen-Maria; Saumier, Daniel; Brunet, Alain (2021). “Trauma on duty: cognitive functioning in police officers with and without posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)”. European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 12 (1). doi:10.1080/20008198.2021.1959117. ISSN 2000-8066. PMC 8555514. PMID 34721819.
35. ^ Alder, Catherine M.; Hayler, John D.; Henderson, Richard K.; Redman, Anikó M.; Shukla, Lena; Shuster, Leanna E.; Sneddon, Helen F. (2016). “Updating and further expanding GSK’s solvent sustainability guide”. Green Chemistry. 18 (13): 3879–3890. doi:10.1039/c6gc00611f. ISSN 1463-9262.
36. ^ Horie, K.; Barón, Máximo; Fox, R. B.; He, J.; Hess, M.; Kahovec, J.; Kitayama, T.; Kubisa, P.; Maréchal, E.; Mormann, W.; Stepto, R. F. T.; Tabak, D.; Vohlídal, J.; Wilks, E. S.; Work, W. J. (2004). “Definitions of terms relating to reactions of polymers and to functional polymeric materials (IUPAC Recommendations 2003)”. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 76 (4): 889–906. doi:10.1351/pac200476040889. ISSN 1365-3075. S2CID 98351038.
37. ^ Clarke, Coby J.; Tu, Wei-Chien; Levers, Oliver; Bröhl, Andreas; Hallett, Jason P. (2018). “Green and Sustainable Solvents in Chemical Processes”. Chemical Reviews. 118 (2): 747–800. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00571. hdl:10044/1/59694. ISSN 0009-2665. PMID 29300087.
38. ^ Technical study for the chemical cleaning of Dresden-1. Volume I, Section 1 and 2 (Report). 1977. doi:10.2172/5335747. OSTI 5335747.
39. ^ Zhu, Yunqing; Romain, Charles; Williams, Charlotte K. (2016). “Sustainable polymers from renewable resources”. Nature. 540 (7633): 354–362. Bibcode:2016Natur.540..354Z. doi:10.1038/nature21001. hdl:10044/1/37073. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 27974763. S2CID 205253152.
40. ^ “Water”. PubChem. National Center for Biotechnology Information.
41. ^ Malmberg, C.G.; Maryott, A.A. (1956). “Dielectric constant of water from 0° to 100 °C”. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. 56 (1): 1. doi:10.6028/jres.056.001. ISSN 0091-0635.
42. ^ “The Drive to Make Things Happen”. Virtual Chemistry Laboratory. 2005.
43. ^ Kua, Yin Leng; Gan, Suyin; Morris, Andrew; Ng, Hoon Kiat (2016). “Ethyl lactate as a potential green solvent to extract hydrophilic (polar) and lipophilic (non-polar) phytonutrients simultaneously from fruit and vegetable by-products”. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy. 4: 21–31. doi:10.1016/j.scp.2016.07.003. ISSN 2352-5541.
44. ^ “Lactate d’éthyle – Fiche toxicologique n° 240”. Institut National de Recherche et Sécurité (INRS) (in French). 2001.
45. ^ Chen, Jui-Tang; Chu, Hsiao-Pei (2007). “Densities and Viscosities for Binary Mixtures of Ethyl Lactate with Methacrylic Acid, Benzyl Methacrylate, and 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate at (298.15, 308.15, and 318.15) K”. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 52 (2): 650–654. doi:10.1021/je600568w. ISSN 0021-9568.
46. ^ “Annotation Record for Ethanol”. PubChem Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB). National Center for Biotechnology Information.
47. ^ Sierra-Amor, Rosa (2001). “CRC Handbook of Laboratory Safety, 5th ed. A. Keith Furr, ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LCC, 2000, 774 pp., $149.99”. Clinical Chemistry. 47 (11): 2075. doi:10.1093/clinchem/47.11.2075a. ISBN 0-8493-2523-4. ISSN 0009-9147.
48. ^ Institut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung (IFA) (2016). “2-Methyltetrahydrofuran anhydrous”. GESTIS-Stoffdatenbank.
49. ^ Kumar, Anuj; Shende, Diwakar Z.; Wasewar, Kailas L. (2020). “Extractive separation of levulinic acid using natural and chemical solvents”. Chemical Data Collections. 28: 100417. doi:10.1016/j.cdc.2020.100417. S2CID 219461679.
50. ^ “Levulinic acid”. PubChem. National Center for Biotechnology Information.
51. ^ Ariba, Houda; Wang, Yanjun; Devouge-Boyer, Christine; Stateva, Roumiana P.; Leveneur, Sébastien (2020). “Physicochemical Properties for the Reaction Systems: Levulinic Acid, Its Esters, and γ-Valerolactone” (PDF). Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 65 (6): 3008–3020. doi:10.1021/acs.jced.9b00965. ISSN 0021-9568. S2CID 219417194.
52. ^ Wohlfarth, Christian (2016), Lechner, M. D. (ed.), “Surface tension of levulinic acid”, Surface Tension of Pure Liquids and Binary Liquid Mixtures, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, p. 86, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48336-7_83, ISBN 978-3-662-48335-0
53. ^ Agrawal, Kushagra; Chakraborty, Pritam; Kishore, Nanda (2020). “Thermochemical Mapping of Levulinic Acid Conversion to Pentane in Supercritical Water within the Framework of Density Functional Theory”. Energy & Fuels. 34 (9): 11061–11072. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01906. ISSN 0887-0624. S2CID 225513425.
54. ^ Stull, Daniel R. (1947). “Vapor Pressure of Pure Substances. Organic and Inorganic Compounds”. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry. 39 (4): 517–540. doi:10.1021/ie50448a022. ISSN 0019-7866.
55. ^ Clará, René A.; Marigliano, Ana C. Gómez; Sólimo, Horacio N. (2009). “Density, Viscosity, and Refractive Index in the Range (283.15 to 353.15) K and Vapor Pressure of α-Pinene, d -Limonene, (±)-Linalool, and Citral Over the Pressure Range 1.0 kPa Atmospheric Pressure”. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 54 (3): 1087–1090. doi:10.1021/je8007414. ISSN 0021-9568.
56. ^ “Limonene”. PubChem. National Center for Biotechnology Information.
57. ^ “Limonene”. American Chemical Society. 2021.
58. ^ Thomas, Gerald A.; Hawkins, J. Erskine (1954). “Physical and Thermodynamic Properties of Terpenes. IV. The Dielectric Constant, Refractive Index and Density of Some Terpenes 1”. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 76 (19): 4856–4858. doi:10.1021/ja01648a026. ISSN 0002-7863.
59. ^ Wang, Xiangyu; Pan, Hongwei; Jia, Shiling; Lu, Zifeng; Han, Lijing; Zhang, Huiliang (2023). “Mechanical properties, thermal behavior, miscibility and light stability of the poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)/poly(propylene carbonate)/polylactide mulch films”. Polymer Bulletin. 80 (3): 2485–2501. doi:10.1007/s00289-022-04173-7. ISSN 0170-0839. S2CID 247408345.
60. ^ “Propylene Carbonate”. PubChem. National Center for Biotechnology Information.
61. ^ Gouw, T. H.; Vlugter, J. C. (1964). “Physical properties of fatty acid methyl esters. I. density and molar volume”. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 41 (2): 142–145. doi:10.1007/BF02673494. S2CID 85252625.
62. ^ Gouw, T. H.; Vlugter, J. C. (1964). “Physical properties of fatty acid methyl esters. V. Dielectric constant”. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 41 (10): 675–678. doi:10.1007/BF02661406. S2CID 86752228.
63. ^ Gouw, T. H.; Vlugter, J. C.; Roelands, C. J. A. (1966). “Physical properties of fatty acid methyl esters. VI. Viscosity”. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 43 (7): 433–434. doi:10.1007/BF02682408. S2CID 85301006.